verhoffin 发表于 2013-6-27 18:43
fuji本来就是大忽悠。这种打乱拜尔排列的滤镜的专利其他厂商早就有了，为何不推出？就是因为没多大作用反而让RAW变得不兼容。fuji这种靠耍花招的厂商，只能忽悠说jpg画质超全副了。画质其本质上还是普通apsc级别。

melfes 发表于 2013-6-27 16:44
In RAW mode, the major difference in our resolution chart between the RX1 and RX1R is moiré, which is very apparent in images from both cameras but positively psychadelic in the case of the RX1R. As usual though, we've found that out in the real world, things are a little different. In everyday shooting, assuming you're not taking pictures for the sales brochure of a chain-link fence manufacturer, moiré is less problematic, and the RX1R does seem to offer a genuine (albeit not enormous) increase in resolution over the RX1. We'll be doing much more testing in the days and weeks ahead.

http://www.dpreview.com/previews/sony-cybershot-dsc-rx1r/5

然后想想X20那个颜色...果然说是X-TRANS，实际上还是以去低通为主，打乱滤镜排列并不能带来什么大提升

雪丁哥 发表于 2013-6-27 20:05
你脑袋没问题吧？看看索尼的摩尔纹多可怕！

1.人家说的是索尼rx1和rx1r，和xtrans有什么关系？用普通的cmos来证明高技术的xtrans？可笑之极！

2.人家的意思是说索尼的rx1r去低通后效果不明显，说明rx1r是挤牙膏，同时证明这种普通cmos去低通的意义不大！索尼从来摩尔纹严重！

3.dpreview从来都是肯定xtrans的分辨率比普通cmos好得多，看看他涉及xtrans的测评吧，要末是任何iso都有极好的画质分辨率印象深刻，要么是高感细节丰富令人印象深刻！

关键是xtrans去了低通依然比索尼带着低通的cmos还纯净！噪点比很多现在的全幅还少。