【想入手一个长焦】

272 13

[1 楼] 鲁C [泡菜] 14-6-5 18:37 现在手头只有一个14-42电动头，想入手一个长焦，现在很纠结。 45-150,45-175,45-200.哪个合适呢？
[14 楼] 老年大力士 [资深泡菜] 14-6-6 16:43 dsli111 发表于 2014-6-6 14:13 松下是100-300，光圈大一点4-5.6，体积也大一点，有防抖，对焦不如奥巴的75300快，锐度众说纷纭，说75300在300时候比松下锐一点的人多一点。我觉得差别会很小。莫不如什么机器就用什么镜头我是松下100-300也觉得奥巴75-300ii在300端锐度要稍好些,但我机身G5没防抖只能用带防抖的100-300.
[13 楼] dsli111 [资深泡菜] 14-6-6 14:13 鲁C 发表于 2014-6-6 13:31 好作品啊，松下有75-300？松下是100-300，光圈大一点4-5.6，体积也大一点，有防抖，对焦不如奥巴的75300快，锐度众说纷纭，说75300在300时候比松下锐一点的人多一点。我觉得差别会很小。莫不如什么机器就用什么镜头
[12 楼] 鲁C [泡菜] 14-6-6 13:31 dsli111 发表于 2014-6-6 01:04 75-300ii，em1动体跟踪对焦，6.5幅连拍从很远起飞一直到从头上飞过，熟练以后基本都成功好作品啊，松下有75-300？
[11 楼] 老年大力士 [资深泡菜] 14-6-6 11:02 flanker011 发表于 2014-6-6 10:46 是设置成CAF和焦点跟踪吗？是的.
[10 楼] flanker011 [泡菜] 14-6-6 10:46 老年大力士发表于 2014-6-6 09:58 用追踪对焦熟练后可以拍飞机、打飞出鸟. 是设置成CAF和焦点跟踪吗？
[9 楼] flanker011 [泡菜] 14-6-6 10:45 dsli111 发表于 2014-6-6 01:04 75-300ii，em1动体跟踪对焦，6.5幅连拍从很远起飞一直到从头上飞过，熟练以后基本都成功你好，看过你在聚乐发的帖子，谢谢
[8 楼] 老年大力士 [资深泡菜] 14-6-6 09:58 flanker011 发表于 2014-6-5 19:39 您好，我打算入手100-300拍飞机，但又担心焦距长对焦慢，请问对焦速度胜任吗？谢谢用追踪对焦熟练后可以拍飞机、打飞出鸟.
[7 楼] dsli111 [资深泡菜] 14-6-6 01:04 flanker011 发表于 2014-6-5 19:39 您好，我打算入手100-300拍飞机，但又担心焦距长对焦慢，请问对焦速度胜任吗？谢谢 75-300ii，em1动体跟踪对焦，6.5幅连拍从很远起飞一直到从头上飞过，熟练以后基本都成功制造商 : OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. 型号 : E-M1 光圈 : f/7.1 曝光时间 : 1/2500 ISO感光度 : 200 焦距 : 300mm
[6 楼] flanker011 [泡菜] 14-6-5 20:32 bearshi 发表于 2014-6-5 19:52 有一个著名的野外摄影师thom hogan是用100-300的。 Thom's Mini Review: Relatively inexpensive. Optically it delivers excellent performance for a low-cost telephoto. Yes, there's some vignetting and corner softness at the extreme, but we're talking about 600mm equivalent here. I don't know of any other bargain 600mm that performs as well. The lens' mediocre aperture specs do hurt low light use of the m4/3 bodies, though. You'd be much better off with a fast prime in low light, but unfortunately there are none (you could use a converter with a third-party lens). Focus ring is very smooth, zoom ring slightly less smooth, but still quite acceptable. Optical stabilization on lens selectable by switch. Good build quality. Note that this lens fully extended sticks out 9" (with hood) from the front of the camera. Your little camera won't look so little. Recommended 我给你简单翻译一下。相对便宜。作为廉价长焦，光学素质优秀。有色差和暗角问题。但是，没有其他便宜的600mm镜头可以做得更好。光圈偏小，不适合低光拍摄。同焦 ... 非常感谢
[5 楼] bearshi [泡菜] 14-6-5 19:52 有一个著名的野外摄影师thom hogan是用100-300的。 Thom's Mini Review: Relatively inexpensive. Optically it delivers excellent performance for a low-cost telephoto. Yes, there's some vignetting and corner softness at the extreme, but we're talking about 600mm equivalent here. I don't know of any other bargain 600mm that performs as well. The lens' mediocre aperture specs do hurt low light use of the m4/3 bodies, though. You'd be much better off with a fast prime in low light, but unfortunately there are none (you could use a converter with a third-party lens). Focus ring is very smooth, zoom ring slightly less smooth, but still quite acceptable. Optical stabilization on lens selectable by switch. Good build quality. Note that this lens fully extended sticks out 9" (with hood) from the front of the camera. Your little camera won't look so little. Recommended 我给你简单翻译一下。相对便宜。作为廉价长焦，光学素质优秀。有色差和暗角问题。但是，没有其他便宜的600mm镜头可以做得更好。光圈偏小，不适合低光拍摄。同焦段上没有M43原生大光圈定焦。对焦环很顺，变焦环手感可以接受。带防抖。做工不错。镜头完全伸出很长。总之，推荐。 flanker011 发表于 2014-6-5 19:39 您好，我打算入手100-300拍飞机，但又担心焦距长对焦慢，请问对焦速度胜任吗？谢谢
[4 楼] flanker011 [泡菜] 14-6-5 19:39 老年大力士发表于 2014-6-5 19:36 这三个中45-175最好,但长焦打鸟还是100-300及75-300为好. 您好，我打算入手100-300拍飞机，但又担心焦距长对焦慢，请问对焦速度胜任吗？谢谢
[3 楼] 老年大力士 [资深泡菜] 14-6-5 19:36 鲁C 发表于 2014-6-5 18:37 现在手头只有一个14-42电动头，想入手一个长焦，现在很纠结。 45-150,45-175,45-200.哪个合适呢？这三个中45-175最好,但长焦打鸟还是100-300及75-300为好.
[2 楼] lxyscls [泡菜] 14-6-5 18:38 转50-200 等40-150 pro 35-100 其他都太狗