观鸟类网站Mirroless Camera Comparison发布了OM1 和G9II的对比测评。篇幅很长，涵盖全面。感兴趣的看看。
Panasonic G9 II vs OM System OM-1 - The 10 Main Differences and Full Comparison - Mirrorless Comparison

我觉得高速度连拍跟焦方面om1绝对优秀！
因为是堆栈式cmos。

单次对焦：松下G9 ii肯定有不错表现，
而且摇摇乐不挑镜头，
具备了高分辨率出片，

打飞鸟为主选om1
偶打飞鸟+单次打静鸟还是选G9 ii，且视频牛，防抖也不错！

多谢！
看下来，om1在自动对焦、高ISO和计算摄影方面更好，其他方面都是G92更好！作者似乎是更倾向于G92
发布自 iOS客户端

ConclusionLet’s address the obvious: if you’re keen on serious video capabilities,
whether you’re a videographer or a hybrid shooter, the G9 II is the
superior choice by a significant margin. It offers more resolution,
faster frame rates, superior dynamic range (up to 60p), and boasts an
array of additional settings. However, this isn’t groundbreaking news;
historically, Panasonic has consistently outperformed Olympus/OM System
in the realm of video.Yet, if you’re here, chances are you’re also inclined towards still images and seek guidance on which of these
two cameras is the better choice for photographers. If that is the case,
we have more facets to explore.

DC-G9M2, 1/500 sec, ƒ / 4.0, ISO 500
LEICA DG ELMARIT 200/F2.8+TC1.4The integration of phase detection autofocus has significantly elevated the
competitiveness of the G9 II. Sure, the OM-1 came out on top in most of
my tests, and its Bird Detection mode is more reliable, but the Lumix
can now match a very similar level of performance, and the difference in
keeper rate is rarely a deal-breaker.Furthermore, the G9 II brings a good improvement in image quality – a rarity in the micro four
thirds realm nowadays. While the additional 5MP might not appear
significant, the sensor comes with more dynamic range, especially when
adjusting shadows in post-production.Panasonic has also made significant strides in areas where Olympus/OM System previously held
unrivalled superiority. For example, the company has caught up with
5-axis stabilisation, and the G9 II performance has reached a level
where the difference from the best-in-class OM-1 is negligible for the
most part.Another example is the high-resolution mode, where the G9 II not only can work hand-held like the OM-1, but also mitigates
motion artifacts, a capability the OM-1 lacks.Finally, the Lumix model showcases greater versatility within the micro four thirds system.
For instance, its fastest drive speeds, with or without Pre-Burst, are
compatible with any lens, whereas the OM-1 is restricted to specific
M.Zuiko lenses depending on the setting used.

OM-1, 1/2000s, f/6.3, ISO 3200
M.Zuiko 100-400mm at 400mmAt this point, you might assume I lean toward the G9 II. However, it’s
important to note that the OM-1 retains several key advantages.
Alongside its more accurate autofocus, it boasts better high ISO
performance, produces less distortion with the electronic shutter,
offers superior battery life, a more user-friendly menu system, and
unique features like Live ND and Focus Stacking. Moreover, at the time
of writing, it’s often available at a discounted price, making it the
more budget-friendly option.Ultimately, both cameras excel in their performance and you’ll need to dive into all the details described
in this article to understand which product suits your needs best.One last thought I can add is that the OM-1 now faces a robust competitor
in the micro four thirds segment. While this benefits photographers by
providing them with more choices, it also indicates that OM System will
need to up their game for their next high-end model.

好像链接连不上了，有同学能帮忙贴一下结论吗？
发布自 iOS客户端

好文，对比很详细，而且松下暗部对焦，实时曝光的快门卡频表现也说了出来，我看B站极少人会说这一点。

哎，松下啊松下。
发布自 iOS客户端

哎呀，挡住了，推荐设置那里是连续对焦灵敏度啥的，设置为+1，+1，0。

终于有评测吐槽松下的对焦了，和我的使用体验一模一样
下面还给了推荐设置，回头试一试。

看完了，谢谢分享！这俩口子相机测评一般都不错