關於旁軸的一個問題
579
7
|
[1 楼] 雲流萍蹤
[泡菜]
09-10-30 12:40
請教一下
我最近一段時間對旁軸比較感興趣 但奈何資金問題 想請教一下 Contax G2 和 福倫達 如何? 哪個更好? |
|
[8 楼] 随便什么
[资深泡菜]
09-11-1 03:59
原文由 雲流萍蹤 发表 如果提到眼镜的时候,通常都是取景范围几乎是满框,眼睛贴的不够近,所以看不到全部的取景范围 |
|
[7 楼] 雲流萍蹤
[泡菜]
09-10-31 23:10
原文由 freedom123 发表 能解釋一下戴眼鏡有什麽不便麽?沒用過旁軸 真的不是很懂。。。謝謝 |
|
[6 楼] freedom123
[泡菜]
09-10-31 15:07
原文由 雲流萍蹤 发表 R2M是35MM框线,取景器整体覆盖28mm焦距范围。 R3M是100%放大率,40mm框线 都反复提到“不戴眼镜”,旁轴取景,戴眼镜确实是个麻烦,不像单反,戴眼镜没有任何不便。 |
|
[5 楼] 雲流萍蹤
[泡菜]
09-10-31 11:44
原文由 yunwuchen 发表 我在網上搜索了一下 發現了下面這段文字 The advantage of the R2M is the 35 frameline, and that IF you don't wear glasses, some people use the full frame of the viewfinder for an approximation of a 28mm field of view -- although the hot shoe mounted 28 accessory viewfinder does a better job. The advantage of the R3M is the life-size 1.0x magnification viewfinder. This means that if you focus with your right eye, you can shoot with both eyes open, giving you full periphery viewing far beyond the framelines with less eye strain. And of course, the 40 frameline mates perfectly with the very popular Voigtlander 40/1.4 Nokton. With the higher magnification, you also get slightly more accurate focusing as the R3M has a longer effective rangefinder baselength than the lower magnification R2M. IF you don't wear glasses, you may find it useful to use the entire full R3M viewfinder as a 35mm field of view. 這段文字比較了R2M和R3M中取景器的區別。因爲我以前使用單反,對旁軸的取景器一無所知,所以不是很明白爲什麽。有誰能幫我解答一下麽? |
|
[4 楼] yunwuchen
[资深泡菜]
09-10-30 15:06
回楼主
福伦达目前在产的机械旁轴相机为BESSA R系列,共有R2A、R3A、R4A和R2M、R3M、R4M六个型号 此外还有同是确善能出品的Zeiss Ikon品牌ZM和SW两型号 |
|
[3 楼] 雲流萍蹤
[泡菜]
09-10-30 13:31
福倫達有還在生産的機械旁軸麽?
|
|
[2 楼] Ilford爱好者
[泡菜]
09-10-30 12:53
原文由 雲流萍蹤 发表 G2只有G头可以用,但是这些头性价比极高。G2除了取景小点,其他都不错。福伦达可以用M口的镜头,选择面很大。但是如果要求不高,是不错的选择。 |