http://www.※※※※※※※.com/watch?v=vcTf78b8WfY

车的大小与安全性

http://www.※※※※※※※.com/watch?v=ZviTLS5jhFg

[夜渔 编辑于 2009-11-13 10:44]

[2009-11-13 11:09 补充如下]



Completing the recent roof-crush tests of the smallest cars on the road, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has now exhaustively evaluated seven micro- and minicars: the Chevrolet Aveo, Honda Fit, Hyundai Accent, Kia Rio, Mini Cooper, Smart Fortwo and Toyota Yaris.
  
This year in addition to the roof crush tests, the IIHS also tested bumpers. Last year it did frontal, side and rear crash tests on these smallest-of-the-small cars. The IIHS also tested three of the seven against slightly larger cars. All ratings are expressed on a scale of Good, Acceptable, Marginal and Poor. There's good news and bad news in the overall testing results.

  
Roof crush tests: Most recently the insurance institute tested the roof strength of these tiny cars in a rollover. The Smart was the only model to get the highest rating of Good; the Aveo got a Marginal. The Accent, Fit, Mini, Rio and Yaris all received the second highest rating of Acceptable. None got the lowest rating of Poor.
  
This overall good showing might surprise some, but because of the light weight of the vehicles their roofs don't have to work as hard to keep the structure around the occupants intact in a rollover, according to the insurance institute.
  
Frontal crash tests: In this test, the Fit, Mini, Smart and Yaris all got a Good rating. The Aveo, Accent and Rio got the second highest rating of Acceptable.
  
Side crash tests: Things didn't go as well in the side crash tests. The Fit, Smart and Yaris all got Good ratings. The Mini got an Acceptable. But the Aveo got a Marginal and the Accent and Rio got a Poor. Surprisingly. The Smart got its Good score despite the fact that the driver's door came unlatched during the test. The same thing happened when it was tested in the federal government's side crash test, which the National Highway Safety Traffic Administration conducts.
  
Rear crash tests: These tests show how well the head restraints and seats protect against whiplash in a low-speed, rear-end collision. The Fit and Mini were the only models to get a Good rating. The Smart got an Acceptable. The Yaris got a Marginal and the Aveo, Accent and Rio got Poor.
  
Bumper tests: Unlike the other tests that gauge the ability to protect occupants in a crash, the four bumper tests examine the damage to an owner's wallet. None of the bumpers in this group earned a top rating of Good and just one, the Smart, got an Acceptable. The Aveo earned a Marginal. The rest got the lowest rating of Poor. The Rio had the highest total damage at $9,380 for all four repairs; the Smart had the lowest total damage of $3,281.
  
Now the bad news: Okay, so the Fit, Smart and Yaris got Good ratings in frontal crash tests, which replicate two vehicles of similar weights crashing into one another head-on. But then the insurance institute crashed these small vehicles into midsize cars from the same manufacturers to show that very small cars will be the losers in crashes even with cars that are just a little bit bigger -- not even full-size.
  
The Fit was crashed with a Honda Accord, the Smart with a Mercedes-Benz C-Class, and the Yaris with a Toyota Camry. The smaller cars, previously rated Good in frontal crash tests, now suddenly were rated Poor. Unfortunately, this is what happens in the real world when vehicles of all sizes have to try to play well together on our roads.
  
Consumers may access complete crash information at http://www.iihs.org.

有对中国消费者偷工减料的嫌疑。

只看到满天的气囊，什么时候国产的fit也能一样？？操操~~

换普桑捷达测试下…直接一堆零件…

是没有, 他搞错了. 都是红车. 我也搞混了.

又看了一遍，没看见CAMRY和SMART对撞。IIHS这些试验都是自家对撞。

小日本的车啥时候硬过?

丰田自己承认了, 为了追求第一, 扩展过快, 质量管理没有跟上.

这回自动加速的事估计没那么容易搞定的.

看图片，飞度和SMART的底盘还是直的，YARIS的大梁都弯掉了。

感觉这10年丰田真的是在走下坡路，质量也没过去的光环了，安全性也一般般，不过话说回来，这十年日本货整体都是在下滑，从电器到汽车

第二个录像的结尾. SMART很惨.


YARIS的司机就算不挂也得残了, FIT的驾驶舱变形相当小, 司机可能受点轻伤.

哪里有CAMRY对SMART的碰撞试验？

   丰田也搞过YARIS和LEXUS LS的碰撞测试，速度为55公里。
    美国人搞得这个测试速度为64公里，结果就杯具了。
飞度貌似还比较完整。

个大力不亏

看起来飞度比雅力士还好些

这个速度明显低多了.

没啥重复的必要 凯美锐对火车一样  

关键是级别差着呢

最后凯美瑞和smart撞那个景象太...

不过这种实验只做一次吗？应该看看重复性怎样

嗯、搜了一下，辉腾PK波罗是50公里，很希望时速90能PK一下。。

这个图上看  其实奔驰的溃缩区刚刚启动

那个时候没有这个设计理念

前边的保险杠没有钢梁  一般是靠元宝梁也就是纵梁

支撑

那个年代的纵梁都是坚固无比 完全不考虑吸能 再撞下去估计SMART会非常惨

真正想要重创奔驰的驾驶舱 估计SMART会变成席梦斯床垫

当年AMS也组织过几回大车撞小车，有奔驰S欺负SMART，帕萨特欺负LUPO，还有一个谁欺负欧宝可赛（就是两厢的赛欧）……

用户已注销，历史内容不予显示

钢材进步了   换个 30年代产的拖拉机试试

用户已注销，历史内容不予显示

用户已注销，历史内容不予显示

用户已注销，历史内容不予显示

FIT还稍微好点，但鸭梨士终于露出了所谓“五星”碰撞成绩的真面目、、

唉、、辉腾对撞波罗的照片就不转贴了、、、不要说辉腾不如凯美瑞结实。

期待各种粉丝的光临。。

所以说光看星星没意义  还要看大小  重量

火车也没有星星 也没有气囊

那是谁都惹不起

怕撒特星星低于  飞渡 并不意味着一定不如飞度安全 如果是S600比 怕撒特 星星多  比怕撒特大而且重

那八成是怕撒特变成弱者了

用户已注销，历史内容不予显示

这样的结果真是恶梦啊，以后开小车要小心躲着点了

撞后的YARIS

撞后的SMART

撞后的FIT