（从英国卫报网站翻译得来）
    据英国卫报报道，自然※※博物馆09年度野生动物摄影师已经被剥夺1万英镑的奖金，原因是他被发现可能租用了一只被驯化的西伯利亚狼来表演在野外很少见到的景象。
这项评奖吸引了94个国家的超过43000幅作品参赛，评委们确信罗德里格斯是从马德里野生动物园雇佣了一只叫作奥辛的狼，这和他宣称图片是他在野外耐心地追踪这种濒危物种了几个月后得到的描述相矛盾。
    竞赛规则禁止使用动物模特，今天早上组织者已经将这幅作品从伦敦博物馆取下，并且禁止他再参加比赛，宣布他们对于这种不合格行为很失望。具有讽刺意味的是，他给自己的图片命名为“有故事的狼”，但是标题作者授予其“租来的狼”。
    现在无法联系到罗德里格斯，但是竞赛组织者说他继续坚持否定狼是被驯化的。
   “我记得当时想，我的天，它一定是一只野生狼，拍下它真实个巨大的成功！”评审委员会主席马克•卡沃丁这样讲，“我根本无法理解这种心态，人们对这个摄影师很失望。”
    组织者说他们正计划在自然※※博物馆竖立一个告示，向参观者解释他们相信这幅图片是摆拍的，由于几千本印有这幅作品的被BBC在世界广泛出版，现在将这幅作品从这些书中删除已经太晚而变得不可能了。
    当竞赛专家评审团允许动物模特得奖是，争论就已经第一次出现，大家关心这种揭露会伤害到这个比赛本身，而这个比赛是这类摄影中最富盛名的。
   “年度野生动物摄影师是一个激励像我们一样的动物摄影师更具创造力的名人，所以在比赛出现这种情况很让人失望”参与评奖的野生动物摄影师克里斯•高莫赛尔这样讲。
“在野生动物摄影界，有着这样的道德准则，其中非常明确的理解就是你拍了一个被捕获的对象，你应当在你的说明中加以声明。”
    罗德里格斯已经告诉评审他会对他想拍下的东西先勾勒草图，但是“当他得到他梦里的景象，他完全不能相信。”他说他主要担心的是狼群“可能过于小心”。
    据Carwardine 报道，吉姆•布兰登伯格，作为一个评委同时也是有着45年给狼拍摄经历的野生动物摄影师，对这张作品感到惊奇，它被抓拍的那么清晰而且明显在捕猎农夫的家畜。他声称这是一个“熟练地抓拍瞬间”，但是在仔细研究了奥辛和罗德里格斯的作品后，他现在99.9%的确信这是一只驯化的狼。
    当西班牙的摄影者们认出这匹狼并且认出了地点在皇家野生动物园时，组织者开始对于图片怀疑警觉起来。研究狼的专家也质疑一只野生动物很可能从栏杆间挤进来，而这只狼却会从门上跳进来。
    评委们将他们要求罗德里格斯为他的故事提供进一步的证据，是否有任何人能够作为目击证人支持他，但是目前他的回答是不充分的。
原文如下：
The Natural History Museum's wildlife photographer of the year has been stripped of his £10,000 prize, after judges found he was likely to have hired a tame Iberian wolf to stage the image of a species seen rarely in the wild.
The judges of the award, which attracted more than 43,000 entries from 94 countries, said they were convinced José Luis Rodriguez hired the wolf called Ossian from a Madrid wildlife park, contradicting his claim the image was taken in the wild after months of patient tracking of the dwindling species.
Competition rules prohibit the use of animal models and this morning organisers took down Rodriguez's image from the exhibition at the museum in London, banned him from entering the contest again and announced they were "saddened" by the disqualification. Apparently without irony, he had titled his image The Storybook Wolf, but headline writers have since dubbed it the "loan wolf".
Rodriguez could not be contacted, but the competition organisers said he continued to strongly deny the wolf was tame.
"I remember thinking, my God, this really is a wild wolf, what an achievement," said Mark Carwardine, chairman of the judging panel. "I don't understand the mentality at all. People feel very disappointed with the photographer."
The organisers said they were planning to erect a notice at the Natural History Museum explaining to visitors their belief that the photo was staged, although it is too late to remove the image from the thousands of books that have been published by BBC Worldwide.
The controversy is thought to be the first time the competition's expert judging panel have allowed an animal model to win a prize and there was concern the revelation could damage a contest which has a reputation as the most prestigious of its kind in the world.
"The wildlife photographer of the year is the one institution that has pushed us [animal photographers] to be more creative, so it is very sad it has happened to this competition," said Chris Gomersall, a wildlife photographer who was involved in judging.
"In wildlife photography there are ethical guidelines and there has always been an explicit understanding that if you take pictures of a captive subject, you declare it on your caption."
Rodriguez had told the judges he had sketched the shot he wanted to get on paper, but "couldn't quite believe it when he got the shot of his dreams". He said his main fear had been that the wolves "would be too wary".
Jim Brandenburg, a judge and a wildlife photographer with 45 years experience of taking pictures of wolves, marvelled at the image of the animal, captured so clearly and apparently hunting a farmer's livestock. He declared it "a masterfully executed moment", but having studied pictures of Ossian and Rodriguez's image, he is now "99.9%" sure it is a tame wolf, according to Carwardine.
The organisers were alerted to suspicions about the image by Spanish photographers who recognised the wolf and the location as the Cañada Real wildlife park. Wolf experts also questioned why the wolf would jump the gate when a wild animal was more likely to squeeze between the bars.
The judges said they asked Rodriguez for corroboration of his story and if there was anyone who could act as a witness to back him up, but his answers were inadequate.

的确,至少还是只狼,假在不是真正的野生
国内作假的话应该是把一只狗Ps成一只狼

已经不是单纯的遭假了,  而是背后复杂的社会关系, 国外只是单纯的摄影比赛,  那有那么多的什么当官的,  有钱的跑出来沽名钓誉的!

--------------------------------
其实最大的不同就在这里，国外也在处理作假，我们也在处理作假。国外的特点是严谨，而且整个事件的处理目的是为了杜绝或者减少这种现象，目光比较长远，是为了以后赛事的正常举办。
而我们的某些协会仅仅在就事论事，明显可以确定作假了，还要说什么“合作”，这让大家对于这些协会组织的比赛明显失去了信心和兴趣了。
不知道以后这些协会的比赛如何举行下去。

国外有假照片没什么新鲜的,  不同于中国处理的方式也不同,  该行业协会处理还是法律很明白.

好吧，至少这是只狼。。。比周老虎专业多了。。。

不奇怪.

好像大家对于作假已经司空见惯，见怪不怪了？

网络时代，你想都不需要想......

你简直就是另辟蹊径啊！
弓虽！

这类人还是多点好。如果不绞尽脑汁造假，也不绞尽脑汁打假，人类迟早演化成广场鸽。