以前用宾得，本人穷人一个，没用钱买超广，就喜欢用18-55的18端拍人像，那种畸变的冲击力让我很喜欢，以致于卖掉了16-45/F4，转用套头18-55。现想用索尼，想问问用过此头的朋友，此头的广角畸变厉害吗？此头的综合素质如何？

拍人要能看出桶变，那是赚大了，鱼眼头可不便宜。

不过瘾再来一张。
虽然这样，我还在用她，
因为：
ymngkg
泡菜  
泡网分:7
交易分:0
帖　数:390-1
图　数:0/182-0
字　数:13K-0K
注　册:2008年08月  

拍人像主要是看相机后面那个头了，前面那个头意思不大

价格还便宜，直溜溜的东西能给你整弯了，有图为证：http://photo.xitek.com/showphoto.php?photoid=458091

拍人像主要是看相机后面那个头了，前面那个头意思不大

应该说的不是透视导致的畸变，而是桶形畸变

透视畸变能够修正？那不成了移轴镜头了？

用18-70套头吧
我想不会有比他控制畸变更差的了

按楼主的说法，1680za的冲击力比16105更厉害，因为广角端的畸变更明显些

18端拍人像？那不是和dc也没啥太大区别了么

16-45的广角端修正得特别好，没有18-55有冲击力。三星的10-17是鱼眼头了，又用不习惯

广角透视畸变，是越广越强烈啊！

还是用宾得吧。三星10-17，才2500元。和16-105差不多价格，够冲击吧。

16不是更冲击吗，为啥卖了呢

是个有独特要求的人啊。

MTF：
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/sony_16-105_3p5-5p6_m15/page3.asp

结论:
来自：
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/sony_16-105_3p5-5p6_m15/page4.asp

Conclusion - Pros

    * Hugely useful wide angle to telephoto range - arguably the most flexible currently available
    * Extremely sharp at wide angle
    * Impressive resistance to flare
    * Small size and lightweight
    * Good build quality

Conclusion - Cons

    * Chromatic aberration at both wideangle and telephoto ends
    * Extremely soft in the middle of the zoom range at wider apertures
    * Somewhat soft at telephoto
    * Stiff manual focus ring with excessively short travel

Overall conclusion

The Sony DT 16-105mm F3.5-5.6 is a lens which certainly promises a lot, with a tremendously useful zoom range wrapped up in a surprisingly compact body. It may not at first glance have the headline-grabbing attraction of those superzooms which sport 200mm or even 250mm telephoto ends, but I'd venture to suggest that as a single-lens solution, it's more useful for the majority of general-purpose work, with the additional width more than compensating for the shorter length (it's much easier to crop the occasional long shot than stitch a wideangle composite). And in real world shooting it generally delivers on its promise, producing attractive results across a wide range of shooting conditions with a minimum of fuss.

Of course every silver lining has its cloud, and the compromises which are inevitable in such an ambitious design aren't hard to find. Chromatic aberration at wideangle and telephoto is very pronounced, and because the fringing is red/cyan in colour, it shows up frequently in real world use. The corners are soft wide open at 16mm and 25mm, but this is ultimately a relatively trivial issue in photographic terms; stopping down to F8 is all that is needed to sharpen them up. More worrying is the loss in resolution across most of the frame at larger apertures in the middle of the zoom range, where you'll need to use F8 or F11 to get the best results. (To be fair, this is not exactly the first zoom which works best at these apertures, and it won't be the last either.)

This therefore is a lens which will repay you with good results once you get to know and appreciate its foibles, and even put them to good use - for example that mid-range corner softness could be useful when shooting portraits, to help emphasize a subject placed towards the centre. And it must be said that when this lens is good, it's very good indeed, easily providing sufficient resolution for the Alpha 350's 14.2 Mp sensor at optimal focal lengths and apertures. Crucially in side-by-side comparison shots, it's streets ahead of the 18-70mm kit lens, and therefore an ideal upgrade for users seeking a more capable general purpose lens.

In summary, this is a very good lens for Alpha users. The versatility of the focal length range goes a long way towards making up for the inevitable optical compromises, and as such the lens easily earns our recommendation.