汽车残值是可靠性的最好指标
1156 11
[1 楼] fspeeder [资深泡菜]
10-4-12 10:25
我觉得比JD Power 的那个初始可靠性评价还可靠。甚至比CR的每百车报告问题数也好,
因为这个问题数不加权,发动机死掉了一个报告,电动座椅的按钮松动也是同样算一个报告。欢迎拍砖。
[12 楼] KNDETIE [泡菜]
10-4-12 12:50
原文由 fspeeder 在2010-04-12 10:39发表

2008 Jaguar S-Type — 31.3%


意外。。。。。。
[11 楼] 加馅儿火烧 [注销用户]
10-4-12 12:49
用户已注销,历史内容不予显示
[10 楼] 捞一把 [禁言中]
10-4-12 12:18
原文由 fspeeder 在2010-04-12 10:39发表
列单子比较复杂,同样的车型才可比。受人欢迎的车型残 ......

应该是同一类车的前三和后三. 比如中型普通轿车, CAMRY/ACCORD/ALTIMA/MALIBU/FUSION/SONATA等一起比才有意义.

比如BENZ有的车型残值高不代表可靠性好, 只是不少人买旧车爱面子而已.
[9 楼] 齐速 [资深泡菜]
10-4-12 12:17
原文由 fspeeder 在2010-04-12 10:25发表
我觉得比JD Power 的那个初始可靠性评价还可靠。甚至比CR的每百车报告问题数也好,
因为这个问题数不加权,发动机死掉了一个报告,电动座椅的按钮松动也是同样算一个报告。欢迎拍砖。


原文由 捞一把 在2010-04-12 12:15发表

我早说过, JD的头三年的做个参考就行了, 都是保修期内的, 和装配有很大关系, 而且大多是很小的毛病.

长期可靠性, 看残值是很好的指标.


不过国内的情况要看国内的残值吧?这个看老外的指标是不是不搭界了?
[8 楼] 捞一把 [禁言中]
10-4-12 12:15
原文由 fspeeder 在2010-04-12 10:25发表
我觉得比JD Power 的那个初始可靠性评价还可靠。甚至比CR的每百车报告问题数也好,
因为这个问题数不加权,发动机死掉了一个报告,电动座椅的按钮松动也是同样算一个报告。欢迎拍砖。

我早说过, JD的头三年的做个参考就行了, 都是保修期内的, 和装配有很大关系, 而且大多是很小的毛病.

长期可靠性, 看残值是很好的指标.
[7 楼] fspeeder [资深泡菜]
10-4-12 11:51
原文由 FarQ 在2010-04-12 11:06发表
想夸你的丰田就夸吧

还要绕个圈子,羞羞答答


说实话我没觉得我的丰田多好。80年代末的丰田本田是好,现在的质量的确下降了。
只是其它的车更差而已。没有很多选择。
[6 楼] FarQ [禁言中]
10-4-12 11:06
想夸你的丰田就夸吧

还要绕个圈子,羞羞答答
[5 楼] fspeeder [资深泡菜]
10-4-12 10:39
原文由 上帝的仁慈 在2010-04-12 10:26发表
有车型表吗?列出来看看


列单子比较复杂,同样的车型才可比。受人欢迎的车型残值高。比如敞篷车。但是同样的车,比如雅格凯美瑞MALIBU就可以用残值作指标了。

这里是把所有的车放一起的:

Top 10 Cars With the Best Residual Value
By Warren Clarke, Automotive Content Editor
Email

If you're looking to purchase a new car, you'll probably want one that won't lose too much of its value to depreciation. Well, potential buyers, take note: With resale value in mind, we've compiled this list of the 10 cars likely to depreciate the least during ownership. Included is the percentage of its original value that each vehicle is likely to retain after five years with an annual mileage of 15,000. Our residual value percentages are based on each car's national True Market Value (TMV® price plus typical options and destination charge. Rankings and figures are updated monthly.

     1.  2006 Honda S2000 — 51.7%

     2.  2006 Mini Cooper — 51.5%

     3.  2006 Acura TSX — 47.7%

     4.  2006 BMW M3 — 47.6%

     5.  2006 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class — 47.0%

          2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK55 AMG — 47.0%

     7.  2006 Infiniti G35 — 46.9%

     8.  2006 Acura RSX — 46.5%

     9.  2006 Lexus SC 430 — 46.5%

   10.  2006 Subaru Impreza WRX STI — 46.4%

http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/list/top10/115129/article.html

这里是残值最低的:

Top 10 Cars With the Worst Residual Value for 2008
By Warren Clarke, Automotive Content Editor
Email

Residual value is more important than most new-car shoppers realize. Higher residual values mean lower monthly payments if you opt to lease, and improved resale value if you decide to purchase your new ride. This list takes a look at the 2008 cars with the worst resale values; these vehicles are those likely to depreciate the most once you drive them off the lot. Our list includes the percentage of its original value that each vehicle is likely to retain after five years with an annual mileage of 15,000. Residual value percentages are based on the national True Market Value (TMV® price, plus typical options and destination charge.

You might think that these cars are to be avoided like the plague, but this isn't necessarily the case. Some of these vehicles can be real bargains. Many boast low price tags. Furthermore, the cars on this list can be downright steals when purchased used. In the used market, a low residual value works in favor of the consumer.

2008 Kia Rio — 26.3%

2008 Kia Spectra — 27.0%

2008 Hyundai Accent — 28.0%

2008 Suzuki Reno — 29.2%

2008 Suzuki Forenza — 29.3%

2008 Mercury Grand Marquis — 30.4%

2008 Kia Amanti — 30.6%

2008 Chevrolet Malibu Classic — 30.7%

2008 Hyundai Sonata — 30.8%

2008 Jaguar S-Type — 31.3%
[4 楼] BYY [禁言中]
10-4-12 10:33
原文由 上帝的仁慈 在2010-04-12 10:26发表
有车型表吗?列出来看看

米国最常用的是kelley blue book. http://www.kbb.com 可以自己试试。

[BYY 编辑于 2010-04-12 10:34]
[3 楼] 齐速 [资深泡菜]
10-4-12 10:28
原文由 fspeeder 在2010-04-12 10:25发表
我觉得比JD Power 的那个初始可靠性评价还可靠。甚至比CR的每百车报告问题数也好,
因为这个问题数不加权,发动机死掉了一个报告,电动座椅的按钮松动也是同样算一个报告。欢迎拍砖。
有道理
[2 楼] 上帝的仁慈 [资深泡菜]
10-4-12 10:26
有车型表吗?列出来看看