腾龙的A16与B005镜头有什么不同?

2972 11

[1 楼] jiabx [资深泡菜] 10-8-15 00:08 如题,我们宾家用户应先哪个?
[12 楼] 大怪兽 [泡菜] 10-10-15 23:52 再pentax版谈论这个问题毫无意义
[11 楼] FenixZhang [泡菜] 10-10-15 23:52 原文由 boeforce 在2010-10-15 23:40发表没用过A16，但是B005的成像很好，防抖也很实用，不知道你的much better原因在哪里，性价比？貌似A16没比B005便宜多少。二手的价格，以英国为例，A16也就比B005便宜20镑左右。 you can check this on photozone with canon or nikon mount,don't know why I can't open it now in lab B005 is better in CA control, but this can also be corrected easily in post processing, however its sharpness in corner is far too behind that of A16. Actually these two lens have very different design despite the same range.
[10 楼] jiabx [资深泡菜] 10-10-15 23:42 原文由 FenixZhang 在2010-10-15 23:32发表 In terms of IQ, A16 is much better than B005. The only advantage of B005 is its shake reduction 听说应该是不只是减少了震动,在色彩方面可能提高了很多,但体积变大了
[9 楼] boeforce [泡菜] 10-10-15 23:40 没用过A16，但是B005的成像很好，防抖也很实用，不知道你的much better原因在哪里，性价比？貌似A16没比B005便宜多少。二手的价格，以英国为例，A16也就比B005便宜20镑左右。原文由 FenixZhang 在2010-10-15 23:32发表 In terms of IQ, A16 is much better than B005. The only advantage of B005 is its shake reduction
[8 楼] FenixZhang [泡菜] 10-10-15 23:32 In terms of IQ, A16 is much better than B005. The only advantage of B005 is its shake reduction
[7 楼] marsdvd [泡菜] 10-10-15 23:19 据说改善了偏黄的毛病，我有A16 有些偏黄
[6 楼] zyn4 [资深泡菜] 10-8-16 20:32 原文由 jiabx 在2010-08-16 20:28发表为什么P口的都比别家贵一二百元?因为小众的原因? 产量小成本就高。
[5 楼] jiabx [资深泡菜] 10-8-16 20:28 为什么P口的都比别家贵一二百元?因为小众的原因?
[4 楼] Luckeer [泡菜] 10-8-16 19:22 B005是防抖版。没有PK接口。
[3 楼] jiabx [资深泡菜] 10-8-16 19:20 再详细些.
[2 楼] 大怪兽 [泡菜] 10-8-15 00:28 A16 B005别家的镜头防抖版