DXO测评徕卡M10——画质达到顶级半幅机水准

1989 21

[1 楼] 萌龟库巴 [泡菜] 17-12-16 11:25 DXO测评徕卡M10——画质达到顶级半幅机水准 https://www.dxomark.com/leica-m10-classic-reinvented/ 和顶级的全幅机相比，色深和动态范围都存在较大差距。 While the M10’s overall score and sub-scores are good, they fall behind the best full-frame image quality we’ve found with the Sony A7R III and the Nikon D850. As you can see, head-to-head against the top-performing Nikon and Sony full-frame sensors, both with 100 points, the Leica M10 achieves a lower result for all three sub-scores. For color depth (Portrait score), the Leica M10’s 24.4 bits is a stop behind the Sony AR7 III at 26 bits, and around a stop-and-a-third off the Nikon D850 at 26.4 bits. The gap is also slightly wider with dynamic range (Landscape score) results, where the Leica M10’s 13.2 EV is trumped by over 1.5 stops by both the Sony A7R III at 14.7 EV and the Nikon D850 at 14.8 EV.
[22 楼] mark1008 [老坛泡菜] 17-12-26 01:05 沒有倒數前幾名已經很大的進步了，分數已經比M9好很多了（86 vs 69），不過即使和100分的比，我還是喜歡69分的。
[21 楼] 如果说 [注销用户] 17-12-25 14:43 用户已注销，历史内容不予显示
[20 楼] IP不死I [禁言中] 17-12-25 14:35 相信DXO的都是SB，一家索妮自办的测评网站，披着客观的外衣
[19 楼] zwg_sh555 [陈年泡菜] 17-12-25 14:34 萊卡現時的機身和鏡頭用“科學指標”測定都不怎樣。然他的片子還是“有看頭”的。
[18 楼] laohehuai [泡菜] 17-12-25 14:26 玩leica是玩旁轴系统，反正对不上焦，要那么细腻干神马
[17 楼] z37418 [陈年泡菜] 17-12-20 09:12 M10有这个成绩就算不错了，当年M9评测几乎垫底，就差说赶上手机的水平了。但是在二手市场看看M9现在什么价格，成像什么效果，恐怕不是几个评测参数可以说明的。
[16 楼] 太秦 [泡菜] 17-12-20 08:20 @萌龟库巴 m10是我手头相机中画质倒数第一（参数上看）的，但却是我最喜欢、最能激发摄影乐趣的，实现我对于135相机的所有期待（除了那个残废的iso转盘），对于我个人，这就够了本帖由无忌论坛V3.1.0 iPhone6 iOS11.1.1 客户端发布
[15 楼] 丁页 [资深泡菜] 17-12-19 23:13 反正不降价本帖由安卓客户端发布
[14 楼] geekboy [资深泡菜] 17-12-19 23:01 萌龟库巴发表于 2017-12-16 11:29 总分如下，和大疆最新的X7，以及佳能备受质疑的5DSR并列。那5DSR也是半幅机水准了关门，放电子哥
[13 楼] 来者犹可追 [禁言中] 17-12-19 19:39 萌龟库巴发表于 2017-12-16 11:26 画质可以媲美顶级的半幅机，特别是在暗光条件下有优势。 In fact, the Leica M10’s sensor scores are more on par with the best APS-C chips we’ve tested in mirrorless cameras, such as the Samsung NX500 and the Sony A6300. Headline sub-scores for color depth (Portrait) and dynamic range (Landscape) are either the same or better for both the Samsung NX500 and the Sony A6300. Dynamic range is better at base ISO for these top-performing APS-C chips, too, offering half or two-thirds of a stop better performance compared to the M10 at base ISO. So while the M10’s 24Mp full-frame CMOS sensor has great specifications, it doesn’t quite hit its full potential. Where the M10 outperforms the APS-C chips is for low-light ISO performance (Sports), thanks to its physically-larger full-frame sensor, with larger photosites, pixel pitch, and light-gathering capabilities. So good color sensitivity as well as dynamic and tonal range can be captured on the M10 up to ISO 2133, which is around a third of a stop better than for the ... DXO测评的得分不是画质的得分，是传感器的得分，所以按照这个得分的排名不是画质的排序
[12 楼] jjjkkkjjjkkk [泡菜] 17-12-19 16:23 差一小数点就买了
[11 楼] 非白 [泡菜] 17-12-19 15:36 一盘菜，同样的原材料，厨师不一样，味道不一样，摆盘视觉效果也不一样。单单比较菜的蛋白质含量，脂肪含量，纤维含量，不能最终解释口感和满足感。机身，镜头，只有大量的使用对比，才能明白自己最需要的。奥林巴斯，佳能，徕卡，各自有大量粉丝，没有对错，只有差异化的选择罢了。
[10 楼] 瓜田李下 [陈年泡菜] 17-12-17 16:18 估计也只有那些新手或者纯器材党才会看cmos评测买相机吧。。
[9 楼] 天堂来潮 [禁言中] 17-12-17 15:34 这些老梗每年都说，没新意，徕卡画质哪次评测不是垫底？本帖由无忌论坛V3.1.0 iPhone6 iOS11.1 客户端发布
[8 楼] zuckertang [泡菜] 17-12-17 15:19 萌龟库巴发表于 2017-12-16 11:25 DXO测评徕卡M10——画质达到顶级半幅机水准和顶级的全幅机相比，色深和动态范围都存在较大差距。 While the M10’... 我的葡七再牛逼七天不带也就停了还不如我女儿的斯沃琪一年不换电池照样准本帖由IOS客户端发布
[7 楼] flature [泡菜] 17-12-17 12:45 还好没入手
[6 楼] chengzhhh [资深泡菜] 17-12-16 17:31 M10这么差劲啊，差点想买了，看来先观望先。
[5 楼] johnsir [泡菜] 17-12-16 12:52 建议楼主将帖子放到微单区会激起很多共鸣..
[4 楼] 诸葛先生 [泡菜] 17-12-16 11:36 这个是骂还是夸啊，没看明白。
[3 楼] 萌龟库巴 [泡菜] 17-12-16 11:29 总分如下，和大疆最新的X7，以及佳能备受质疑的5DSR并列。
[2 楼] 萌龟库巴 [泡菜] 17-12-16 11:26 画质可以媲美顶级的半幅机，特别是在暗光条件下有优势。 In fact, the Leica M10’s sensor scores are more on par with the best APS-C chips we’ve tested in mirrorless cameras, such as the Samsung NX500 and the Sony A6300. Headline sub-scores for color depth (Portrait) and dynamic range (Landscape) are either the same or better for both the Samsung NX500 and the Sony A6300. Dynamic range is better at base ISO for these top-performing APS-C chips, too, offering half or two-thirds of a stop better performance compared to the M10 at base ISO. So while the M10’s 24Mp full-frame CMOS sensor has great specifications, it doesn’t quite hit its full potential. Where the M10 outperforms the APS-C chips is for low-light ISO performance (Sports), thanks to its physically-larger full-frame sensor, with larger photosites, pixel pitch, and light-gathering capabilities. So good color sensitivity as well as dynamic and tonal range can be captured on the M10 up to ISO 2133, which is around a third of a stop better than for the APS-C chips.