帮俺想个理由
350
10
|
[1 楼] mirage
[泡菜]
01-3-7 14:10
俺想将手上的NIKKOR AF 80-200 f2.8 ED new(带脚架环)换成AF-S 80-200 f2.8。请各位说说到底后者好了多少?(只谈影像素质!)以让俺决定。
另,出手NIKKOR AF 80-200 f2.8 ED new(带脚架环)。行货,包装、说明、保修卡俱全,少用,极新。有意者与[email protected]联系。 [mirage 编辑于 2001-03-07 14:24] |
|
[11 楼] leicam7
[陈年泡菜]
01-3-7 21:11
不值得换。像质没多大提高,但价格差了将近一倍!
|
|
[10 楼] Diesel
[陈年泡菜]
01-3-7 18:17
转载再转载:
>>Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 EDAF-D (w/ collar) Lens This lens has problems. As a 10 year owner of the old AF version, I thought there would be no difference. Boy was I ever wrong. The newer one is mechanically nice, and the tripod collar works quite well. The big problem is sharpness. This lens really sucks when wide open at the 200mm end. Everything is soft and fuzzy. I have no idea why this is, but I do know my old version was tack sharp wide open at all focal lengths. Leave it to Nikon to screw up a good thing. I'm not the only one who has noticed this either. _________________________________________________________ Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 AF-S (w/ collar) Lens This lens is even worse than the 35-70/2.8 I bitch about above. Although I was never stupid enough to buy one, one of my most trusted friends (a pro) did. He got so pissed off over the poor performance of this lens that he bailed on Nikon and switched to Canon. The main problem with this lens is vignetting. He showed me his results and let me play with this lens. Here's an experiment for you: take this lens, open it up to f2.8, point it straight up into the blue sky and take a shot. When the slide comes back, you'll see terrible fall-off in the corners (they're at least a full stop darker than the rest), and a huge white donut in the center (probably 2 stops lighter than the rest). What the hell is Nikon doing? They had a great thing with the oldest 80-200/2.8 AF lens. Can they do nothing right these days? __________________________________________________________ |
|
[9 楼] 人言
[资深泡菜]
01-3-7 17:01
不值得换,像质几乎没什么提高,价格贵了一倍不说,多的那几百克的重量,嘿嘿,你出门时背着就知道了。
|
|
[8 楼] superbigmouth
[资深泡菜]
01-3-7 16:47
有书说AF80-200mm是针对了80-150mm段优化的,而AF-S80-200mm就是针对150-200mm段优化的!还有就是对焦快一点,就是一点,如果DX你要捕捉那千钧一发的场面就非他莫属!
还有一个理由就是你现在袋子里的钱闷的慌啦!一定要用掉!那我无话可说啦! |
|
[7 楼] jsnjdbh
[陈年泡菜]
01-3-7 16:39
理由有如下几点:
1.尼康味少一点,德国味浓一点;(我瞎猜的) 2.长焦端的光学表现更出色一点;(美国大众摄影说的) 3.尺寸重量更大一点,看起来更威风一点; 4.价钱是原来的两倍还多一点,回头率无疑会更高一点。 其实我倒想建议你用两者的差价买一AF180MM2.8D定焦,可能还有赢余。 |
|
[6 楼] guangjiao
[资深泡菜]
01-3-7 16:27
没错,我的手掌全长过180MM,单手能拿起180斤以上的任何器材
|
|
[5 楼] 淡入淡出
[泡菜]
01-3-7 15:36
车机呀!那有身高180MM,体重180斤的高级动物呀!高18公分。。。哈哈!guangjiao 你竟然还符合这标准。。。哈哈哈!!!
|
|
[4 楼] guangjiao
[资深泡菜]
01-3-7 15:03
我符合这条件,但这俩镜头我都不买,因为用的全是手动头.
![]() S是静音马达,效果如馅饼所说. |
|
[3 楼] cheji
[陈年泡菜]
01-3-7 14:50
不值得换。除非你180mm以上身高,180斤以上体重……
|
|
[2 楼] 馅饼
[数码相机版主]
01-3-7 14:14
好像能声音小点 快一点
其他素质差不多 |
