http://bbs.fblife.com/viewthread.php?tid=956871&extra=page%3D1&page=1

看人家德车多扎实，翻来翻去照样开。日本车去死。

说得这么露骨，会有人指摘你。

嘿嘿，那是啥年头的事情了？

本猫从军那会，PLA还有大把大把的3MT变速箱的212在役，那玩意哪来的车内防滚架？——腰线往上就只有撑棚子的几根拇指粗俄杆子

军用的北京吉普好像有车内防滚架的，就像现在的勇士车一样，钢管外面包覆聚氨酯合成材料。

呵呵，德国车和日本车，其实都很扎实，最不扎实的就是国产合资车。

神车！主要来自神一样的感觉！

没加。要是加了，AB柱仪表台能看到的。

弯形是肯定变了，但驾驶仓没全塌也是真的。

原来倭国人是日耳曼人生出来的呀！？

LC80的自重记得好像超过2600kg，只是空重，看这车的样儿应该不会发烧到车身改了钢管车架碳纤维外壳，加上防滚架等重量，只会更重

如此分量，那个屌车要不是改装过加了防滚架，驾驶室已经扁扁了

晾衣服杆子也比没有强，这哥们要是开的本猫在PLA开的那种北京吉普，现在已经在天国了

买了这车，你得到※※去转转，在广州城里开这车多没意思。

你以为，解放区这么多740 530，4，3这两个数字的贴字，是BMW的最畅销配件。

这啥狗P防滚架，X形的加固都没有。就两根晾衣服杆子。

等你想买的时候, 525这种菜车估计已经绝迹了.

这个差一点完蛋，防滚架已经完蛋了——换了老式的212，没有这个架子，就一定over

http://bbs.fblife.com/viewthread.php?tid=588254

下这种不到45度的坡,除非故意先加油然后前轮下去之后踩着刹车不放,否则只要会开车的人都不可能向前翻的

那台车没加架子。

开装架子的车主，不会犯这么低级的错误。

算了下，花掉的能整个525LI的钱。那天装嫩也泡不到妞，俺买5系去。

玩越野的车一般都是做了加强的，大部分内部有钢管架，不能当平常上路的车来看待吧。

我没有眼花吧,这帖子序号乱七八糟的

说的好像很熟似的？大防抖早已经步入了购买5系7系S系的年纪，只是死皮赖脸装嫩而已。

你那些车子换5系？换哪代的？

不用跟二十年前比, 跟十年前比比, 甚至五年前比比? 再想想如果按这趋势, 五年, 十年, 二十年后如何? 等你到开5系的岁数, 国内5系的价钱应该跟国外接轨了.

车一个是机头，一个是底盘，这二样都OK，就是好车

那跟那，M POWER玩不起，开5系的岁数没到。那天累了，折腾不了，就把手头车子全出掉换个5系。

生活当然比二十年前美好，美好的生活就不需批评？

写手很明显是个大闷蛋。
别看见人家写英文便当是神。

LC是德国车，不错！德国人也觉得不错！

俩吧?

Fuck the bitch,这不是污蔑神么！Smart本身就是开着玩的，还当他是万能的啊？用它平日在城里代步就好了。

今天找到的,本世纪来最差的十种车.一个日本车入选,有没有德车就不知道了,呵呵!

1. Smart ForTwo
2008-present

2009 smart fortwo
We don't have a problem with small cars in general (we're big fans of the Mini Cooper), just with ones that don't deliver on the benefits of going small. The pint-sized ForTwo sacrifices a lot of passenger space for a relatively unimpressive 41 mpg on the highway, has an SUV-like propensity to roll over, and is equipped with an aggravating sequential manual transmission. Sure, the ForTwo looks cute, but after you drive it you won't be smiling anymore.

Kelsey Mays contributed to this story.


2. Chrysler Sebring
1995-present
The previous-generation Sebring wasn't a bad car in its day, but Chrysler dropped the ball with the redesigned 2007 model. With a weak base powertrain, uncomfortable front seats, poor interior quality and haphazard styling, it never had a chance in the highly competitive midsize-sedan segment.

3. Jeep Compass
2007-present
We could have easily chosen the Dodge Caliber for this list — a compact hatchback with unremarkable gas mileage, refinement and crash-test scores — but the hapless Compass edged it out. Why? Besides the fact that you shouldn't spread lackluster product around to more than one division (the Compass is related to the Caliber), it doesn't belong in the Jeep lineup, a brand known and respected for its off-road ability. The Compass is a soft-roading poseur, and not a good one at that.

4. Toyota Echo
2000-2005
The Echo subcompact's high seating position and center-mounted instrument panel were two well-intentioned features that were summarily rejected by consumers (though they would find their proponents in later years and other models). Call the Echo ahead of its time if you must; mainly it just wasn't a very good car. In taking over for the Tercel — a boring but popular choice against offerings from Suzuki, Geo and pre- renaissance Kia and Hyundai — the Echo proved that sometimes bland is better than bold. The problem wasn't that the youth-targeted Echo appealed more to older buyers than to younger ones, it was that there weren't enough of either.

5. Cadillac Catera
1997-2001
To think that Germany's Opel is now the source of many of GM's strongest new models...

In the late '90s, the Opel Omega begat a Cadillac that was sporty in theory but soft and underpowered in practice, rear-wheel-drive in design but front-wheel-drive in feel. And that's just the car. Cadillac didn't help its case with advertising that included the tagline "The Caddy That Zigs," supermodel Cindy Crawford, an animated duck, and the suggestion to "lease a Catera" with the response, "Who's Lisa Catera?" The geniuses responsible for the Catera should have been exiled, but we suspect they went on to develop something called the Pontiac Aztek. Upgrades and deep discounts in 2001 couldn't save the Catera; it went to the duck blind in the sky in 2002.

6. Pontiac Sunfire
1995-2005
The Sunfire managed the rare feat of having a worse interior than its GM twin, the Chevy Cavalier. Cheap interior plastics run amok, a coarse four-cylinder engine and horrendous crash-test ratings sealed its fate. On the flip side, the Sunburn was probably responsible for untold thousands of rental-car upgrades: "Honey, remember Fort Lauderdale last summer? Trust me, we want the Grand Am."

7. Jaguar X-Type
2002-2008

Jaguar X-Type
In the early 2000s, the class of entry-level luxury cars was growing. Most were sporty and started at $30,000 or less. Wanting in, Jaguar came out with the X-Type. From the get-go, critics warned that a cheap Jag would be bad for the brand and that Ford — which bought the company in 1989 — would probably cut corners and sacrifice quality. That was before they saw the product. Sharing its front-drive platform with a European Ford Mondeo, the X-Type was a too-small, not-so-sporty sedan with all-wheel drive that was hamstrung by some of the forewarned quality issues. The trap was clearly visible from miles away, and Ford walked right into it. A 2002 Jaguar X-Type can be had for up to $8,500. A 2002 Honda Civic goes for up to $9,275.

8. Isuzu VehiCROSS
1999-2002
The outrageous Isuzu VehiCROSS two-door SUV, whose extreme styling drew varied reactions, lasted from 1999 to 2001, and even that's surprising. The fanglike grille uprights made it look like it would eat you, which was scary mainly because inside the VehiCROSS was a place no one wanted to be. Headroom was minimal, and the low roof blocked even shorter drivers' view. If the noisy cabin didn't get to you, the punishing ride would. Isuzu deserved credit for taking a chance then on a design likely to find more admirers now, and it deserved scorn for a 2001 sticker price that would be just as preposterous in the current market. The VehiCROSS cost $30,350 by the time it fired up its interplanetary drive and went back where it belonged.

9. Daewoo Anything
1999-2002
We had just tested a Suzuki Esteem and marveled at how competent even the cheapest little econoboxes had become when a leather-lined Leganza midsize sedan showed up — the best Daewoo had to offer. We mused over which would kill us first: the toxic gases from the cheap interior or the recalcitrant transmission and inconsistent acceleration. Three days into the loan, the first Daewoo crash tests in U.S. history came out, and we called Daewoo and told them to come pick up the car. We'd never done that before, and we haven't since.

10. Pontiac Aztek
2001-2005
The Aztek was criticized for the duration of its life for its ghastly styling. Design is subjective, so what do you think of the Aztek shown here? Were the critics wrong? Yeah, we didn't think so.