m43 系统可以完美替代APS系统

Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f/2.0 gets DxOmarked (Click here): “With its extraordinary sharpness for a micro 4/3 lens, the Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f/2.0 is a winner.Pitted against the Nikon 1 NIKKOR 10mm f/2.8, this Olympus 12mm holds an overwhelming advantage. Even more impressive is the fact that this lens can compete with much bigger lenses, such as the Canon 24mm L-series mounted on a 7D. In short, it really does seem that a high-quality, fully micro 4/3 camera-lens combination is perfectly capable of replacing an APS-C combination”

http://www.43rumors.com/dxomark-micro-43-camera-lens-combination-is-perfectly-capable-of-replacing-an-aps-c-combination/#comments

本帖最后由 yxbzhj 于 2012-2-17 17:52 编辑

以下内容由 yxbzhj 于 2012-2-17 18:12 补充
With its DxOMark score of 19, the Olympus 12mm is in first place on the podium; the Canon 24mm on a Canon EOS 7D, with only one point less, is in second place.
With only 8 points, however, the Nikon 1 10mm scarcely seems to merit a place on the podium at all. This said, it’s important to note that there simply isn’t a broad selection of lenses for the Nikon 1 line, and the 10mm just isn’t bright enough to be able to compete with this much brighter 12mm lens. (We keep hearing that more lenses for the Nikon 1— specifically, brighter lenses — will shortly appear… but we’re still waiting for confirmation.)
Bottom line for this comparison: The 12mm has great resolution, and even manages not just to hold its own against the 24mm 1.4 L-series lens mounted on a Canon 7D, but to beat it!
The advantages of the Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f/2.0:
Superior maximum resolution.
Better correction of chromatic aberrations.
Better quality-to-price ratio.
The advantages of the Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM:
Brighter lens.
Better distortion correction.
Better control of vignetting.
The advantages of the Nikon 1 NIKKOR 10mm f/2.8:
Very compact.
Very light.
Conclusion
With its extraordinary sharpness for a micro 4/3 lens, the Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f/2.0 is a winner.
Pitted against the Nikon 1 NIKKOR 10mm f/2.8, this Olympus 12mm holds an overwhelming advantage. Even more impressive is the fact that this lens can compete with much bigger lenses, such as the Canon 24mm L-series mounted on a 7D.
In short, it really does seem that a high-quality, fully micro 4/3 camera-lens combination is perfectly capable of replacing an APS-C combination — and the Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f/2.0 is a particularly high-quality micro 4/3 lens!

根据你前面的表现，你不用说，我也知道你的智商肯定很高。

其实，主要是思维力和判断力高一点点:-)

和语言没关系，羡慕不来的:-)

你的汉语水平也很高啊！

对头，这才是真正的明白人，但是CANON不这么做，FUJI的产品出来肯定会比M43要好，因为它的镜头是专为APS开发的，并且FUJI的光学也是一流的。

英语水平高只是一个方面。看评测首先要看评测方法的说明来了解这些分数的含义。

你肯定没看过DXOMARK这一部分的内容。所以就算是换成中文，以你的水平恐怕也看不出好来。

24L在APS上无法发挥自己的优势，在和专门为M4/3设计的12/F2的对比上落败，也不奇怪。
其实观音完全可以为APS设计一款15mm的高素质定焦，但它不做。

你的英语水平很高啊？

又是一个不会看DXOMARK评测的人。

其实12/2是m43中最搞笑的镜头，因为其成像特点和其用途背道而驰。

25/1.4才是m43真正的牛头。

又是一个吵架帖，个人观点单就成像质量来说现阶段m43没法替代apsc

M43是不是可以替代APS跟技术发展没有一毛钱的关系，完全是日系厂家封闭性的策略使然。CN就算用跟M43差不多大小（甚至更小，如尼康1系统）的感光元件来达到便携性的目的也不会加入M43系统来取代APS的。发展壮大M43系统还是只能靠奥巴和松下，连三星、富士之流都不肯加入。

更正一下：
是gH2+12mm 2.0 打败 7d+24mm 1.4L

这个我正好 G2 和 7D 都有，感觉 G2 也就是便携性和触摸屏的优势，对焦方面速度上差不多 7D 稍快（7D的分区自动对焦那是非常的强悍呀，而且对焦点调整也方便），画质上面高感大约要差一档半的样子，低感的暗部也是没法比。

M4/3 生来就不应该是和单反比画质的，这个厂家要定位好产品，用户要定位好心态。
.

家用级别，M43系统可以慢慢取代APS。说实话APS除了价格，在便携性上也没比全副好多少。所以技术进步、全副价格下降后，APS的生存空间恐怕不多了。

对头，相机是一个系统，不是有一个大底就万事都OK的，其实器材的灵魂就是镜头，以前是，现在也是。 本帖最后由 yxbzhj 于 2012-2-20 22:29 编辑

奇怪，dxo测试感光元件的分数老被大底党拿来说事，结果dxo测试的镜头、镜头加机身m43明显占优却视而不见？

你自己玩的开心就好了，没事总要代替别人干什么？

这可不是我评价的，是权威的机构，再一个不是G2 是GH2

对焦速度,高感。。。。除了体积价格没别的优势了貌似

对焦速度更加完败。。。
景深则是无法逾越的。

哥。。。你那是神机。。。

高感不是全部

为啥要替代呢，各有各的优势。

不可能，就高感1项，就完败于7D.

g2+12mm 2.0 打败 7d+24mm 1.4L

未来有机会替代，体积和价钱＋技术进步（这技术目前看进步速度远快过APS－C单反）。
现在还替代不了，差距还比较明显，用过就知道了。。。