# 12-60mm f/2.8-3.5 weather sealed (22%, 999 Votes)
# 12-35mm f/2.0 High optical quality / Weather sealed (21%, 933 Votes)
# 12-50mm f/2.0 powerzoom, smooth aperture ring, weather sealed (16%, 746 Votes)
# 17mm f/1.4…weathersealed, high quality body (15%, 692 Votes)
# 50-200mm f/2.8-4.0, high optical quality, weather sealed (15%, 669 Votes)
# 35-100mm f/2.0 -> High optical quality / Weather sealed (15%, 668 Votes)
# 25mm f/1.2 Weather sealed, high optical quality. (14%, 653 Votes)
# 17mm f/2.0 weathersealed pancake (14%, 643 Votes)
# 25mm f/1.8 low priced pancake (14%, 622 Votes)
# 12-60mm f/4 OIS, X, small (f4) but high quality, weather sealed (11%, 486 Votes)
# 14-70 f/2.0-2.8 standard zoom, weather sealed not too expensive (10%, 459 Votes)
# 7-14mm/f2.8 by Tokina. USD700. Good optical quality (10%, 456 Votes)
# 10mm f/2.8 (pancake) (10%, 438 Votes)
# 7m f2.5 (400$, linear for architecture) (9%, 425 Votes)
# 300mm f/4.0 weathersealed and affordable (9%, 412 Votes)
# 14mm f/1.2 (9%, 410 Votes)
# 200-400mm f/4 high optical quality, weather sealed (9%, 400 Votes)
# 45mm f/1.2 metal weather sealed prime (9%, 399 Votes)
# 7-14mm f4 with weather sealing. (9%, 394 Votes)
# 25mm f1.4 weather sealed (9%, 391 Votes)
# 2X teleconverter (between the lens and the camera, not in the front of the lens) (8%, 386 Votes)
# 12mm f/2.8 pancake (8%, 385 Votes)
# 12mm f/2 (like current Oly but weather sealed). (8%, 374 Votes)
# 100 f/2.8 -> Macro / High optical quality (8%, 358 Votes)
# 10mm f/1.4 Summilux (8%, 357 Votes)
# 6mm f/2.8 ultra wide angle (no fisheye) (8%, 349 Votes)
# 10-50mm f/2.5-3.5 (8%, 349 Votes)
# 14-60mm f/2.0-2.8 high quality (8%, 348 Votes)
# 100-300 f/4, OS, X, high quality, weather sealed, built in 1.4x converter (7%, 329 Votes)
# 45mm f 1.8 in a weather sealed metal body, same optics as current lens (7%, 312 Votes)
# 90mm f/2 -> macro, weathersealed, tripod mount ring, high quality, ~800 Euro (7%, 305 Votes)
# 12-120mm f/4, video-optimized (7%, 305 Votes)
# 35mm f/1.4 high quality (7%, 304 Votes)
# 150mm f/2.8 weather sealed (7%, 296 Votes)
# 70mm f/1.2mm (6%, 292 Votes)
# 50mm f/1.4 Summilux (6%, 292 Votes)
# 25-100mm f/2.0-2.8 high quality (6%, 291 Votes)
# 100mm f/2.0 weathersealed (6%, 280 Votes)
# 60mm f/1.8 cheap (6%, 273 Votes)
# 8mm/3.5 -Low priced compact UWA (6%, 264 Votes)
# 14mm f/2.0 weather sealed (6%, 262 Votes)
# 75mm f/2,8 pancake (6%, 254 Votes)
# 75-200mm 4.0 – good optical performance, price ~600-800

14-60/2.8-3.5确实是非常理想啊

不过weather sealed…我就算买了个这样的镜头，装上不能防水防尘的G3机身也是白搭

17mm f/1.4…weathersealed, high quality body (15%, 692 Votes)
12-50mm f/2.0 powerzoom, smooth aperture ring, weather sealed (16%, 746 Votes)
如果这俩太贵或者太大的话，下面这俩也挺好
17mm f/2.0 weathersealed pancake (14%, 643 Votes)
14-70 f/2.0-2.8 standard zoom, weather sealed not too expensive (10%, 459 Votes)

中意这个17mm f/1.4…weathersealed, high quality body (15%, 692 Votes)。这个没有，其实这个也不错17mm f/2.0 weathersealed pancake (14%, 643 Votes)

我的wish list：
1、10mm f/2.0，广角定，录像优化，714那个头用下来觉得7－10使用率较低，而且畸变比较明显
2、12-70mm f/2.8，优良光学，电动变焦，录像优化，旅游头
3、17.5mm f/1.2，高端定，自动头，大光圈
4、120mm f/4，远摄定，光圈够用了，体积控制下来 本帖最后由 waynewong1984 于 2012-4-1 07:09 编辑

# 17mm f/1.4…weathersealed, high quality body (15%, 692 Votes)

现在说的当前的4/3和未来的4/3，都是Micro 4/3，不需要多加区分了，画蛇添足。

这个表很符合我的想法，光圈有点偏大，但这不是小画幅的优势嘛。

43rumors上面现在全都是M43的东西好不好，包括这堆都是M43的头

43已经是不被看好的一个类别了，，，多关注一下M43好了，这才有现实意义