XF16-55 对比xf1855
24476
56
|
[1 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-19 09:02
羊年第一帖
Fuji 16-55mm f/2.8 vs 18-55mm f/2.8-4(转载) http://admiringlight.com/blog/fuji-16-55mm-f2-8-vs-18-55mm-f2-8-4/ ~~~ 补充 Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8 vs. Fuji 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 http://admiringlight.com/blog/fuji-50-140mm-f2-8-vs-fuji-55-200mm-f3-5-4-8/ 本帖最后由 笨笨小兔子 于 2015-2-19 09:25 编辑 |
|
[57 楼] xinghuacun
[泡菜]
16-11-12 23:08
雪丁哥 发表于 2016-11-12 20:28 你丫就是骗子! 快滚※※的蛋吧!你丫什么东西啊!![]() |
|
[56 楼] 雪丁哥
[泡菜]
16-11-12 20:28
问题是人家不是给小白用的,小白都抢破头去用,那真正的爱好者岂不是抢不上了?
不是你的东西,不要奢望 cutesleepy 发表于 2016-11-12 20:18 |
|
[55 楼] cutesleepy
[泡菜]
16-11-12 20:18
楼主,小白,第一次入富士,想要16-55头,但很纠结没有防抖。白天无防抖,小白能驾驭么?
本帖由IOS客户端发布 |
|
[54 楼] 随缘浪子
[泡菜]
16-10-17 21:50
没钱,只有18-55
![]() |
|
[53 楼] kanoa
[资深泡菜]
16-10-16 17:19
笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-03-09 08:28 爪机打不开都 本帖由 iPhone8,4 客户端发布 |
|
[52 楼] synyan
[老坛泡菜]
15-3-24 22:06
笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-2-20 09:21 已有10-24、18-55的,有必要再入16-55吗 喜欢16-55更好的广角,以及大光圈 |
|
[51 楼] zjize
[泡菜]
15-3-15 22:51
我很想用自己的18/2换一只18-55用用,不知道加多少米才行?
现在主力创作是35/1.4,但那个头对焦真是蛋痛,不如不是拍人像打死不想用! |
|
[50 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-3-9 16:28
|
|
[49 楼] knightlion
[泡菜]
15-3-2 17:20
没有防抖吗
|
|
[48 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-3-2 16:50
Conclusion
Pros Well-built lens with weather-sealing and smooth and positive controls Fast and accurate autofocus Excellent image sharpness right from f/2.8 throughout the focal range Outstanding contrast and rich saturated color Bokeh is fairly nice for a standard zoom Surprisingly low distortion throughout the zoom range Good flare control in most situations Minimal vignetting Cons Quite large and heavy for a mirrorless standard zoom Pronounced lateral chromatic aberration No optical stabilizer The Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR is a pro-grade zoom lens, and it certainly performs like one. It’s got excellent sharpness right from the maximum f/2.8 aperture, good bokeh for the most part, truly stunning contrast and controls distortion amazingly well. Optically, the only real flaw is the presence of lateral CA. |
|
[47 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-3-2 16:30
终于等到他测试了
Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR http://admiringlight.com/blog/review-fujifilm-fujinon-xf-16-55mm-f2-8-r-lm-wr/ 呵呵! |
|
[46 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-3-2 16:23
国外16-55/2.8测试
Fuji XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon Zoom Lens Review - With This And X-T1, Is Fuji Finally 'PRO'? http://www.soundimageplus.com/soundimageplus/2015/2/25/fuji-xf-16-55mm-f28-r-lm-wr-fujinon-zoom-lens-review-with-this-and-x-t1-is-fuji-finally-pro |
|
[45 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-3-2 16:21
|
|
[44 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-3-2 16:06
|
|
[43 楼] 譬如北辰
[陈年泡菜]
15-2-22 22:03
我那天试了下,感觉挂在X-Pro1上很不合适……我在想要不要去买个灰色X-T1……
|
|
[42 楼] arayashiki
[资深泡菜]
15-2-22 08:54
其实还是看个人习惯吧。如果是以玩为主的旅行就带个x100这样的机器就行了。如果侧重拍摄,我更倾向组双机,一个挂超广还有一个挂大光定视情挂55-200
本帖由安卓客户端发布 |
|
[41 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-22 08:29
|
|
[40 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-22 07:54
Fuji XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Lens Review(简单测试)
February 08, 2015 by Tim Sporcic http://www.planopora.com/photography/2015/2/fuji-xf-16-55mm-f28-r-lm-wr-lens-review Center sharpness at all the focal lengths is incredible. Wide open at 16mm we get a bit of curvature and the corners are a bit soft. At 23mm and 35mm, I see just a touch of softness at the outer edges, and 85mm is essentially perfect from edge to edge. I don't see any vignetting at any of the focal lengths, but I'll have to try against a white background. Overall, this is an insanely sharp, high performance lens that holds its own against the f/2.8 offerings from the big dogs. Here are a few more shots from out at the park. |
|
[39 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-21 10:14
|
|
[38 楼] 日月精灵
[泡菜]
15-2-21 10:08
|
|
[37 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-21 09:33
查看了富士官方全球网站,只有三只镜头作了Professional's Review
分别是 56/1.2APD, XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR, XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR |
|
[36 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-21 09:16
|
|
[35 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-21 09:03
单独为这两标变建立帖子,小汇总
Dave Kai Piper测试富士XF16-55mmF2.8 R ~ About this Project We were asked to design, shoot and prepare a fashion of images to test and showcase the new F2.8 constant, mid zoom lens from Fuji. We did two shoots while testing out the new lens, the first shoot we put together we used the stunning Kenilworth Castle as a stunning background for Bronte and Luke as we shot a festive theme fashion story. The second shoot was much simpler in design and nature. My good friend Jodi and I just grabbed the camera, headed to a shop, picked up some fun items and we had a simple shoot challenge. We had £40 to spend and challenged ourselves to shoot with in the hour on the budget and get 8 images. We shot beauty, landscape, fashion, city and all sorts of styles. From big planned out shots at Kenilworth to just grabbing and going. The lens was perfect and gave me so much confidence to walk into any situation and deal with it. The lens is just as sharp wide open and clean to the edges giving me confidence to creatively work. When you are shooting with a good lens you forget it is there and become an extension of your camera and becomes part of the flow. Image quality is of course important and the lens delivers to a point where every image you take you know is going to be sharp, in focus and be just the way you want it. The lens gives a wonderful tone and it is super easy to play with the depth of the images with the fact that this is a constant F2.8 lens. |
|
[34 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-21 08:59
Dave Kai Piper测试富士XF16-55mmF2.8 R
http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujinon_lens_xf16_55mmf28_r_lm_wr/professionals_review/ 最后结论: Photographer's Testimonial Personally, Fuji have done an amazing job and continue to do an amazing job with extending the range of lenses opening up the X-System to many different photographers who all have different needs. I have both the 16-55mm & 18-55mm mid zooms and both are very good lenses but are made for different uses. While the focal lengths might be the same that is about the only thing that joins the lenses. The 16-55mm is designed to be the best the lens it can be and does carry the properties that come with a lens designed to be perfect optically. Being a constant F2.8 lens will affect the price, weight & size, these are important, but after the optical quality of the lens. The 18-55mm has been designed to balance out the needs of all users making a smaller lighter around package. |
|
[33 楼] 九亭男人
[泡菜]
15-2-21 08:43
笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-2-19 11:04 16-55确实好头,对我来说重量和体积不可接受。除了120微,哈哈。 对16/1.4有兴趣,希望重量在300克左右。 最近对尼康20/1.8G很关注,全幅轻便的好思路啊,才350克。可是对D750等尼康色彩没有信心。佳能的色彩可以,可是没有轻便的广角好头。 本帖最后由 九亭男人 于 2015-2-21 08:45 编辑 |
|
[32 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-20 09:52
budangfan 发表于 2015-2-19 23:25 谢谢 兔子主张用16-55/2.8 假如时间能倒走的话,2013年发布16-55/2.8,那我肯定不买18-55/2.8-4.0 两镜头设计理念是不同的。 |
|
[31 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-20 09:43
再补充 佳能新发布的EOS 5DS单反 才约930克(CIPA方针) 约845克(仅机身) 他们要拍风景必买11-24/4.0,有1180g重量,镜头重量超过机身是很正常的。 佳能6d网友选择11-24/4.0,那也是有可能的 ~ 富士16-50 (55)焦段有三种 xc16-50 kit xf18-55 优质套 XF16-55/2.8镜皇(等效尼康17-55/2.8级别) 自己选择轻,中,重 ~ 能小者就做小,不能小就算了吧 ~ 无反:应首先宣传的是‘’实时取景曝光‘’,降低摄影门槛,而不是把“小”放在首位。 |
|
[30 楼] 笨笨小兔子
[老坛泡菜]
15-2-20 09:21
是的,我是非常喜欢16-55/2.8,综合性能高,题材广。我原来考虑适马18-35/1.8恒定牛逼头的,看过尼康卡口,佳能卡口,宾得卡口之主题,想了想800克重量+转接环约等于960~1000克,关键焦段太短既没24-26广角,又没有55-84焦段,所以深思熟虑后决定买16-55/2.8标变,保证应该具有的画质前条下,这655克已算是‘不重了’ 新发布的24-70/2.8都接近1000克,其实重量超过我的d800(900克),两家伙加起来真是累。 佳能6d系更轻才675-700多克(电池+卡),也有头重脚轻之感觉…… |
|
[29 楼] 水牛兄
[泡菜]
15-2-20 07:45
|
快滚


本帖最后由 九亭男人 于 2015-2-21 08:45 编辑