笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-2-19 17:20
呵，说得很真心，别到时候又进90/2.0R
这几天我随身携带16-55/2.8拍人文特好

笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-02-19 09:20

呵，说得很真心，别到时候又进90/2.0R
这几天我随身携带16-55/2.8拍人文特好...

ilymengyu 发表于 2015-2-19 16:44
大家16-55都哪里买的？什么价格？

ningmengba 发表于 2015-2-19 11:46
的确不折腾的话16-55的确够好了，素质真高，不过就看到时候出来我能不能忍住呵呵。谢谢兔兔提醒

笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-02-19 03:04

有16-55就不需要再进1855了
我二年前入手1855/2.8-4.0就算了。1855也有优点：轻便，防抖，有点素质。
现在用16...

ningmengba 发表于 2015-2-19 10:50
恩，看过了，感觉16-55买的真心值了，18-55我不会再近了，年后再去试试40-150？看看重量能否承受

niniandido 发表于 2015-2-19 10:26
50140和55200的对比也是分别在55和90以及140段对比

在55段，50140的2.8全开从中心到边缘分辨率非常好，55200的最大光圈3.5全开明显不如55140，在F5.6-F8光圈段分辨率逐渐提升，但与50140仍有差距

在90段，50140最大光圈时稍软，F4时两者差距不大，50140中心和边缘有着一定优势，F5.6-F8时两者差距更小，整个光圈段50140略胜一筹。

在140段两者最大光圈都已非常好，F8时最佳，整个光圈段50140仍然略胜于55200

笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-02-19 02:04

niniandido友已经作了中文翻译

这个网站作了1米距离的测试，反正16-55 1855我都拥有。
我的腾龙A16之17-3...

笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-2-19 10:05
谢了，你的中文翻译
再帮我看看50-140与55-200的对比测试，祝兄弟新年好！

niniandido 发表于 2015-2-19 09:51
楼主贴的只是结论，

看了一下测试者的全文和图片，他分别是测试了18 35和55这几个焦段

18焦段的重点是，1655中心F2.8全开就有非常高的分辨率，1855要缩到F5.6锐度才赶得上，边缘测试1855和1655最大光圈至F4段，1855甚至还略有优势，之后两者相差不大

在35段，两者几乎没区别

在55段1655的优势才显现出来，全开从中心到边缘都有极高分辨率，而1855中心在F5.6时才勉强赶上，边缘全光圈值都不及1655

焦外散景测试没有过多评价，只谈到两者都有非球所以能产生洋葱圈一样的散景光点

不过就测试图来看，1655得益于2.8的确略好1855

ningmengba 发表于 2015-2-19 09:13
这么快就出来了，期待中文翻译

水牛兄 发表于 2015-2-19 09:25
从测试图来看16-55毫无悬念地全面胜出，不负富士“镜皇”之名

笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-2-19 09:08
Conclusion
From this test, it’s clear that the 16-55mm f/2.8 WR is the superior optic when it comes to resolution and bokeh, at least at this closer focusing distance. The 16-55mm holds a small edge at wide apertures at the wide end of the zoom range and a pronounced advantage in resolution at the long end of the zoom range, while also producing more pleasing bokeh. Image contrast is also a bit higher on the 16-55mm. However, it’s worth noting that the 18-55mm does a very nice job stopped down, and at wide apertures from 18-35mm, while producing acceptable images at 55mm and f/4. The 18-55mm’s significantly smaller size and the fact that it’s optically stabilized and significantly cheaper make it a lens still worth considering for many shooters. In pure optical quality, however, the new 16-55mm appears to be well worth its pricetag and weight penalty. I’ll be shooting with the 16-55mm over the next week or so and will have my full in-depth review of this new lens coming sometime next week, so make sure  ...

笨笨小兔子 发表于 2015-2-19 09:08
Conclusion
From this test, it’s clear that the 16-55mm f/2.8 WR is the superior optic when it comes to resolution and bokeh, at least at this closer focusing distance. The 16-55mm holds a small edge at wide apertures at the wide end of the zoom range and a pronounced advantage in resolution at the long end of the zoom range, while also producing more pleasing bokeh. Image contrast is also a bit higher on the 16-55mm. However, it’s worth noting that the 18-55mm does a very nice job stopped down, and at wide apertures from 18-35mm, while producing acceptable images at 55mm and f/4. The 18-55mm’s significantly smaller size and the fact that it’s optically stabilized and significantly cheaper make it a lens still worth considering for many shooters. In pure optical quality, however, the new 16-55mm appears to be well worth its pricetag and weight penalty. I’ll be shooting with the 16-55mm over the next week or so and will have my full in-depth review of this new lens coming sometime next week, so make sure  ...