我的XT2+XT1
5496
80
|
[1 楼] 天琴
[泡菜]
16-9-9 10:18
新机到手,双剑合璧!
以后慢慢发片 |
|
[81 楼] liying2008
[资深泡菜]
17-8-1 09:27
paku 发表于 2016-11-29 00:29 2和1价格差一倍多,像素差800万,对焦速度更快。但画质真的差别不大,尤其是当你使用一般的旅游头时候。 |
|
[80 楼] wolivexu
[泡菜]
17-7-30 07:54
X2真的很好
本帖由IOS客户端发布 |
|
[79 楼] woodysh
[禁言中]
16-11-29 01:48
有必要弄2台同系列的吗
本帖由 iPhone9,2 客户端编辑于:2016-11-29 01:50:07 |
|
[78 楼] paku
[老坛泡菜]
16-11-29 00:29
关心的是2比1画质好多少?如果相差不多的话我直接1好了
|
|
[77 楼] 雪丁哥
[泡菜]
16-9-16 12:43
很简单的问题,那些花高价买了其他相机又眼馋富士且买不起的,咋办,难道痛骂过去自己傻自己没眼光自己知识浅薄?劣根性和低层次决定了这些个社会上不起眼、没人关注的边角料来没门槛的论坛展示自己的低档思维。你看,我总能直戳实质、扒皮剜心!
楼主就是这种人,借来相机喊两嗓子,没成想被揭露个底儿掉。他这种说几句再也不在论坛上富士相片照片交流的人见得多了!他一举手一投足就知道他的实质! zy225 发表于 2016-9-16 11:27 本帖最后由 雪丁哥 于 2016-9-16 13:03 编辑 |
|
[76 楼] zy225
[泡菜]
16-9-16 11:27
富士已经算是小众了,每个帖子都会吵吵,麻烦各位不喜欢富士的摄友们高抬贵手,就不要关注富士版块了。前几批机器有效小问题难免的。想想尼康这么大的厂,出问题的机型还少吗?D600掉渣,D750漏光,D4屏幕偏色,拿些问题科比富士目前的问题都严重很多啊。
|
|
[75 楼] 天琴
[泡菜]
16-9-16 11:21
富士这些公关看来要忙活好长时间了。
机器有点小的不如意在所难免,哪家机器都一样,唯独这富士的公关不饶人,你敢说半点不好就派人围攻你。 来富士论坛的都知道那些看家狗,这么猖狂的狗在滋事,谁还喜欢这品牌?这就像淘宝的评价,一个差评就可能丢掉数十笔订单。 好的公关自有好的办法。 |
|
[74 楼] 快活丞
[泡菜]
16-9-15 22:12
|
|
[73 楼] lili酱
[泡菜]
16-9-12 12:26
一口一个富士狗就说明你世界观有问题!
你有什么权利说别人是富士狗! |
|
[72 楼] 天琴
[泡菜]
16-9-12 11:05
|
|
[71 楼] 糊涂终结者
[禁言中]
16-9-12 08:53
|
|
[70 楼] 快活丞
[泡菜]
16-9-11 22:47
|
|
[69 楼] 快活丞
[泡菜]
16-9-11 22:42
|
|
[68 楼] 天琴
[泡菜]
16-9-11 22:25
|
|
[67 楼] 徽州山人
[陈年泡菜]
16-9-11 15:48
|
|
[66 楼] andbrian
[泡菜]
16-9-11 15:04
|
|
[65 楼] 徽州山人
[陈年泡菜]
16-9-11 14:21
糊涂终结者 发表于 2016-9-11 13:42 又见二狗没完没了到处拉狗屎 |
|
[64 楼] 雪丁哥
[泡菜]
16-9-11 13:58
怕人家说你技术不灵?你灵么?好可笑!你在假设你是高手,你是么?既然不是高手,你会用相机么?咋不找找你自身的原因?有的人从来不知道拿镜子照照自己,总假设自己是完人是大师!错永远是别人它物的,他自己是个神仙上帝!
跑焦的测试一般是针对静态图像,而单电不存在跑焦。你好好学习照相手艺!装作大师没啥意思,大师也不值钱也不是啥高层次职业,好好磨练自己追求个自我满足自我快乐那才是生活。 天琴 发表于 2016-9-11 11:05 本帖最后由 雪丁哥 于 2016-9-11 14:12 编辑 |
|
[63 楼] 糊涂终结者
[禁言中]
16-9-11 13:50
|
|
[62 楼] 糊涂终结者
[禁言中]
16-9-11 13:42
天琴 发表于 2016-9-11 11:02 看看这个帖子吧:三大伪命题之单反iso 对比测试! 高感什么都是骗人的http://tieba.baidu.com/p/4181312398?see_lz=1 这个帖子从实测证明我曾经说过的“数码传感器包括CCD和CMOS只有一个等效ISO,各种高ISO都是后期电路放大增益出来的,扩展的ISO是软件算出来的”道理。当然你看不明白,再纠结什么ISO虚标,纠结拍照片比别家的黑,我也不能再帮助你提高智商了,无能为力了 ![]() |
|
[61 楼] 小竹炮粉丝
[泡菜]
16-9-11 13:00
天琴 发表于 2016-09-11 02:58 听说xt2的evf有紫边,不知道您注意到了没有? 另外,不加手柄情况下,xt2的evf刷新率是多少,您了解么? 本帖由安卓客户端发布 |
|
[60 楼] 徽州山人
[陈年泡菜]
16-9-11 11:41
天琴 发表于 2016-9-11 11:02 |
|
[59 楼] 天琴
[泡菜]
16-9-11 11:39
刚看了别人的评测,放大按钮改成按下后拨轮了
|
|
[58 楼] 天琴
[泡菜]
16-9-11 11:05
|
|
[57 楼] 天琴
[泡菜]
16-9-11 11:02
糊涂终结者 发表于 2016-9-11 08:05 |
|
[56 楼] 天琴
[泡菜]
16-9-11 10:58
|
|
[55 楼] 糊涂终结者
[禁言中]
16-9-11 08:12
|
|
[54 楼] 糊涂终结者
[禁言中]
16-9-11 08:05
我用不着问别人,我早在16楼就说过“数码相机的感光度本来就没有一个强制性的标准”,行业标准都是推荐的,只要求各个厂家明确标出自己所采用的ISO标准而已。你查看照片的EXIF信息时,就会看到SensitivityType的这项标注,富士X-PRO2标注的标准是“标准输出灵敏度 (SOS)”,而尼康D5标注的标准是“推荐曝光指数 (REI)”! 转帖:ISO不是那么简单的 其实只是标准不同 1、胶片ISO 通常胶片的感光度是根据HD曲线确定的,考虑去除灰罩和不线性区,在灰罩密度+0.1密度(对数值)处记录测量到的曝光量H,再增加1.3(对数值),对应的密度应该是灰罩密度+0.1密度+0.8密度,而感光度就是0.8/H。 2、数码ISO(SAT) 这个感光度定义,是通过测量当数码输出饱和(即感光值=1.0)时的曝光量H来决定的,感光度=78/H 3、数码SOS 这个东西也许将来可以替代我们常用的ISO,他的定义是通过测量当数码输出中灰(即感光值=0.18)时的曝光量H来决定的,感光度=10/H 4、测光表用的感光度(EI) 测光和曝光的感光度是两回事,想想用ISO400来测光,但是胶卷是ISO100,然后迫冲的情形就知道了。 常用的测光表是根据中灰场景来测光的,定义是通过计算感光输出中灰(即感光值=0.18)时需要的曝光量H来决定的,感光度=10/H 5、推荐的感光度(REI) 这是一个令人头晕的感光度,定义很简单,厂商认为设置的这个感光度让照片显得正好曝光合适,照片漂亮就OK了,这也许根本算不上一个定义,但是令人悲哀的是,许多厂商喜欢这个宽松的定义,甚至连测光也使用它。不过就大概而言,这个感光度对应的曝光系数通常与ISO(SAT)或SOS相差不大。 CANON新的单反(1DIII,1DSIII,40D)出来前,曾一度指出其感光度以SOS标准定义,后来还是使用了REI,不过我们仍然可以猜测,其感光度定义还是使用了SOS定义,毕竟这个定义会让照片比较明亮,比较讨好。 CANON老的单反(400D之前),曾经使用这样的定义,感光度=ISO(SAT)* 0.75。 ※※※※的解释: The ISO 12232:2006 standard The ISO standard ISO 12232:2006 gives digital still camera manufacturers a choice of five different techniques for determining the exposure index rating at each sensitivity setting provided by a particular camera model. Three of the techniques in ISO 12232:2006 are carried over from the 1998 version of the standard, while two new techniques allowing for measurement of JPEG output files are introduced from CIPA DC-004. Depending on the technique selected, the exposure index rating can depend on the sensor sensitivity, the sensor noise, and the appearance of the resulting image. The standard specifies the measurement of light sensitivity of the entire digital camera system and not of individual components such as digital sensors, although Kodak has reported using a variation to characterize the sensitivity of two of their sensors in 2001. The Recommended Exposure Index (REI) technique, new in the 2006 version of the standard, allows the manufacturer to specify a camera model’s EI choices arbitrarily. The choices are based solely on the manufacturer’s opinion of what EI values produce well-exposed sRGB images at the various sensor sensitivity settings. This is the only technique available under the standard for output formats that are not in the sRGB color space. This is also the only technique available under the standard when multi-zone metering (also called pattern metering) is used. The Standard Output Sensitivity (SOS) technique, also new in the 2006 version of the standard, effectively specifies that the average level in the sRGB image must be 18% gray plus or minus 1/3 stop when the exposure is controlled by an automatic exposure control system calibrated per ISO 2721 and set to the EI with no exposure compensation. Because the output level is measured in the sRGB output from the camera, it is only applicable to sRGB images—typically JPEG—and not to output files in raw image format. It is not applicable when multi-zone metering is used. The CIPA DC-004 standard requires that Japanese manufacturers of digital still cameras use either the REI or SOS techniques, and DC-008 updates the Exif specification to differentiate between these values. Consequently, the three EI techniques carried over from ISO 12232:1998 are not widely used in recent camera models (approximately 2007 and later). As those earlier techniques did not allow for measurement from images produced with lossy compression, they cannot be used at all on cameras that produce images only in JPEG format. The saturation-based technique is closely related to the SOS technique, with the sRGB output level being measured at 100% white rather than 18% gray. The SOS value is effectively 0.704 times the saturation-based value. Because the output level is measured in the sRGB output from the camera, it is only applicable to sRGB images—typically TIFF—and not to output files in raw image format. It is not applicable when multi-zone metering is used. The two noise-based techniques have rarely been used for consumer digital still cameras. These techniques specify the highest EI that can be used while still providing either an “excellent” picture or a “usable” picture depending on the technique chosen. 下面就是你上传的两张照片的EXIF信息: 本帖最后由 糊涂终结者 于 2016-9-11 08:13 编辑 |
|
[53 楼] 小竹炮粉丝
[泡菜]
16-9-11 07:58
天琴 发表于 2016-09-10 15:42 有必要单纯为了这个evf买xt2不? 本帖由安卓客户端发布 |








