3

2

1

R80-200/4拍牡丹

R80-200/4

[杨柳风 编辑于 2010-05-06 20:20]

R 80-200mm/f4

R 80-200mm/f4

这个黄色也不错

昆明的老房子

云南过桥米线

晨练

观察力是需要培养的

看不出来特别在哪~~

这黄色演绎的很舒服

R80-200，200mm端拍的芜尾

[木老佬 编辑于 2010-05-01 22:21]

爱展能 70-210/3.5
无心插柳

2

城市的早晨

祝大家节日快乐。

居然能用手动头抓拍，有功夫啊。

本月最后一张粮票，不能浪费。

草中精灵

绿色

老外

飞燕草2

飞燕草
看看R135/2.8的飞燕草

翻译前3段，最后一段意思不大
Vick, I have that lens, got it as part of a package deal. It is esactly as Ronald says, a very good lens. Distortion is _much less_ than with the Sigma-made/built 28-70 which I also have. The 70-210 was made by Minolta using the same optics as they used in their own mount, though I've seen it written that the Leica version has Leica coatings but I've never seen any authoritative proof of it in the form of something in writing from Leica. So if what you're looking for is excellent performance, it's a keeper. But if you're looking for a special Leica signature, or heads above the rest performance, you won't see it unless you make up your mind to. Probably the 80-200 f/4 in current production has some optical improvements, and if you (like me)prefer 2-ring zooms, it's got that. To install/remove a filter or adjust a polarizing filter on the 70-210 you need to zoom back to 70mm so the shade can be retracted. However the 70-210 is about 300g (that's what, a little over half a pound?) lighter, so given that plus its excellent performance I'm keeping mine as a travel lens. I think I've seen them going for around $400, that's about half of what the least I've seen an 80-200 go for. Can't go wrong unless you're really bothered by the fact its basically a Minolta lens.
VICK，我有那只镜头，并随身携带。就像Ronald所说是只很好的镜头，变形比Sigma的28-70（我也有）小很多。70-210 /4和美能达自己的品牌的70-210使用相同的光学设计，他们用自己的装配，虽然看过它记入徕卡版本的徕卡镀膜，但我从未见过任何权威书面记载证明它的东西来自徕卡。因此，如果您要寻找的优良的镜头，它的就是可以拥有的东西。但除非你下定决心，如果您正在寻找一个特殊的徕卡□□□□或其它性能的镜头，你不会重视到它。大概 80-200 f/4是 当前生产中的镜头中有莱卡光学的改进，如果选择 2个 调节环的镜头，它就是。若要为安装/拆卸滤镜或调整偏振镜 70-210 您需要缩小到70毫米端，才能消除反光。 不过 70-210约 轻300 克 (这是什么有点超过半磅？） 考虑到这一点以及他的优良表现，我将它作为我旅行镜头。我见过80-200/4比它70-210/4贵出400美元，多出一半的钱。除非你特别在意不是莱卡自己生产的而是美能达制造的，否则它是不错的选择。
The 80-200/4.5, 75-200/4.5 and 70-210/4 were all Minolta lenses transplanted into R mounts. The 70-210/4 looked almost like a real Leica knock-off. All these lenses, especially the latter, performed as well as the best Japanese zooms of their days, but the newest (the 70-210/4) was a 1984 design. Performance drops at the long end, there is some distortion, and overall contrast is lower and flare tendency higher than today's best zooms. The 80-200/4 is a Leica design. Only the production is done by Kyocera. After more than a year using this lens my 90/2.8 and 180/2.8 are almost un-used these days, and only occasionally do I pack the 90/2. It's an absolutely magnificent lens. Better performing than the 80-200/2.8 AF-S Nikkor. The older Minolta-based zooms sell in the $500-$800 range, whereas you can get the same optics in a Minolta mount and a Minolta body together for half that cost. OTOH at around $1100-1200, a mint, used 80-200/4 ROM is one of the 2 true bargains in the R system (the other being the 35-70/4 ROM).
R80-200/4.5,R 75-200/4.5 以及R 70-210/4都是美能达为莱卡设计生产的R系列镜头。70-210/4更接近莱卡。这3只镜头，尤其是最后一只与同期日本品牌顶级的变焦镜头一样出色，但最后这只70-210/4是1984年设计的。长焦端成像效果有一点下降，对比度有所降低，光晕比现今最好的变焦镜头微微大一点。80-200/4 是徕卡设计的。是通过京瓷生产的。使用此镜头超过一年后我 90/2.8 和 180/2.8 几乎 这段日子就没用了，只是偶尔把R 90/2装入摄影包。这是一个成像绝对很好的镜头，表现比Nikkor 80-200/2.8 AF S还要好。
而美能达老镜头70-210/4一般只卖500-800美元，再弄个美能达机身与之相配，与花1100-1200美元来买R80-200/4ROM配R系列机身（另一只镜头为R35-70/4），也就可以再少花一半的钱。
I purchased a used 75-200mm Leica zoom in 1986. I was satisfied with the lens performance, but had always read/heard that the lens was a Leitz-Minolta compromise; whatever. About 7 years ago, I purchased a late 180/2.8 and performed some tests projected and louped against the zoom. I saw little difference, and returned the 180 lens. About a year later while in contact with some Leica technical reps, I discovered that this individual also used the 75-200mm zoom. I was impressed and surprised. I guess the kicker was when at about the same time frame, I was speaking with Jim Lager, the well known and respected Leica expert, he told me that he ALSO uses this lens. At that point I decided to stick with the lens until it was no longer useable or fixable. Now I suppose that the new 80-200 zoom is a better lens, but I also suppose that it isn't 4 times better even though it costs 4 times as much the older zoom. Most people will not see or appreciate the differences except under the most extreme and, generally impractical, enlargement sizes. I'd recommend purchasing the 75-200mm lens if you can get one affordably.

我购买了徕卡1986 年生产的2手 R75-200 毫米变焦。尽管总是读到或听说这支镜头是莱卡和美能达联合的产物， 我很满意镜头的性能，大约 7 年前我购买一颗 180/2.8，并做了一些和R75-200测试和 对比。 我发现差异很小，并退回 了R180/2.8 的镜头。一年之后，接触一些徕卡技术代表，我发现这个人也使用 75-200mm 变焦。使我惊讶并给我留下深刻的印象。 我想在相同的时间范围有关我与Jim Lager的谈话，徕卡知名和受人尊敬的信息专家级他告诉我他 也在 使用此镜头时，我震惊了。此时，我决定继续使用并保存这只镜头，直到它已不再可用或可修复。 现在我猜想新的 80-200 变焦镜头更好，但我也想尽管80-200/4比75-200贵出4倍的价钱，它的成像不 会比75-200好过4倍。 大多数人看不出之间的区别，这只有在最极端，不一般的情况下或放得很大以后才能看出差异来。 我建议按性价比就购买 75-200 毫米镜头。

翻译的不好，请不要见笑

这个蓝色还原不错，这种蓝色拍出来很容易偏色，一般都会偏紫。

易俗兄谦虚了，我最近也去拍过一次牡丹，但回来看看基本没有比较满意的，一是还缺乏经验，不得其门，二是最近周末天气虽好，但总是有风，不容易拍清晰，比较郁闷。
牡丹花期短，只能等来年了。