Roleiflex 2.8 GX 感觉好极了!
53951 310
[162 楼] ilike35 [资深泡菜]
08-10-28 22:32
原文由 (扎西德勒) 发表
看来还是用翻转片更能体现出2.8GX的魅力。

不要省力.....也上1張
[161 楼] zc [陈年泡菜]
08-10-27 16:10
KODAK TMAX100 D76
[160 楼] zc [陈年泡菜]
08-10-27 16:07
FUJI ACROS100 D76
[159 楼] satan2k [泡菜]
08-10-26 16:48
Fuji Rvp 100F
[158 楼] satan2k [泡菜]
08-10-26 16:41
Fuji Rvp 100F
[157 楼] satan2k [泡菜]
08-10-26 16:33
Fuji Rvp 100F
[156 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-24 21:49
看来还是用翻转片更能体现出2.8GX的魅力。
[155 楼] satan2k [泡菜]
08-10-22 21:33
刚刚购入,第一次拍胶片,也上一张2.8GX试机片,柯达PPN160过期2年负片。
[154 楼] 几天车夫 [陈年泡菜]
08-10-22 15:07
片子和机子都8错,就是片子发灰感觉还没有到好极了的地步,在PS里调一下色阶和锐化感觉才更好.底片放平和用120片框夹了以后就不会有牛顿环产生了,调了一下.
[153 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-22 07:46
新潮
[152 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-20 01:36
建筑还不错
[151 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-18 10:00
老城区一角,一楼是一酒吧。比国内的设计、装潢差远了。
[150 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-17 12:21
世界著名雕塑家罗丹博物馆门前----思想者。
[149 楼] rollei28f [泡菜]
08-10-16 20:48
上一张GX试机片,PPN160过期负片,自己扫描的,分辨率300
[148 楼] lj4286 [陈年泡菜]
08-10-16 10:12
原文由 (扎西德勒) 发表

上面那张漂亮,速度用一秒?


谢谢!不是1秒就是1/2秒,记不太清了,呵呵.....
[147 楼] 欢乐英雄 [陈年泡菜]
08-10-16 10:01
哦,使用的一般负片。
[146 楼] 欢乐英雄 [陈年泡菜]
08-10-16 10:00
原文由 好色之徒孙 发表
一开始接触到rollieflex的好片子,感觉可以用震撼来形容。一是特别细腻锐利,二是层次异常丰富,立体感强,三是无比“水灵”通透。因此用禄莱拍片,首先还是被其画质所感动。当然,alpa的片子也有此效果,但一是价格过于昂贵,拥有者不多,二是现在镜头反差还是偏大,色彩过度明艳,三是alpa的优势在广角。swc当然不比禄莱差 ......

有相似同感!曾经用过一个老掉牙的禄莱双反,很惊讶,那片子的感觉极好,说不出的舒服,真是胶片中的极品之列!主要是放大细节好、色调柔和细腻,但印象中反差不是很大,色彩不是特别饱和(但依然鲜艳)!
[145 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-16 09:44
原文由 lj4286 发表

呵呵...再顶2张...
3.5F/xenotar

上面那张漂亮,速度用一秒?
[144 楼] lj4286 [陈年泡菜]
08-10-16 09:39
原文由 (扎西德勒) 发表

最小光圈+脚架+翻转片+至少三选一吧?


呵呵...再顶2张...
3.5F/xenotar
2.8FX/planar.老片
[143 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-16 09:37
原文由 仙云野鹤 发表
看不出哪里比数码好

使劲看!
[142 楼] 仙云野鹤 [资深泡菜]
08-10-16 09:29
看不出哪里比数码好
[141 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-16 09:25
Magic show
Kodak 400 nc
epson 3170 板扫
[140 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-16 09:23
Gallery
[139 楼] Realeye [泡菜]
08-10-16 06:35
这里好热闹。

也上1张2.8GX,水草
[138 楼] 好色之徒孙 [资深泡菜]
08-10-15 12:26
原文由 bullcai 发表
兄弟没有那么多禄来,只有一台破破烂烂的3.5F。从实际拍摄来看大逆光下仍然非常不错(不知道最新的镜头是一个什么样子),看来和下文中的解释有些不谋而合。

恩,3.5F后好象禄莱没出过新的3.5机器。
[137 楼] zc [陈年泡菜]
08-10-15 12:20
原文由 (扎西德勒) 发表

漂亮一组,请问是否22光圈及PS如锐化?用的边框软件?谢谢。

多谢!
偶拍风景大多光圈在F16左右,很少用到最小光圈。
扫描用的epson的F3200,一般就是在PS直接调一下颜色(这个扫描仪扫出来的都有点偏色),
就ACTION(动作)加边框了。
PS加的边框,自己偷懒,做了一个动作,每次都是点一下播放就OK。
新建动作,编一个你觉得方便认知的动作名称(偶现在PS的动作里有120,135xRVP,135yRVP,135DELTA100_X....等)
动作(ACTION)步骤如下:
1,缩小图片到你需要的(这张图片是700像素);
2,USM锐化(100%,0.3)
3,复位 色板(为后面一步的画布边框为白色的做准备);
4,画布大小(现在偶用的是900,等于每边留100像素的白边);
5,定义图像大小(为后面的文字做准备);
6,写文字
[136 楼] bullcai [资深泡菜]
08-10-15 12:00
兄弟没有那么多禄来,只有一台破破烂烂的3.5F。从实际拍摄来看大逆光下仍然非常不错(不知道最新的镜头是一个什么样子),看来和下文中的解释有些不谋而合。
[135 楼] bullcai [资深泡菜]
08-10-15 11:52
这里好热闹。

这是在禄来俱乐部里面看到的,不知道有多少是真。
说是HFT版的镜头比原来的双层镀膜要“软”一些。而且镀膜对于中长上的焦距没有太多的效果。

HFT lens coating , really useful or a 1970's marketing gimmick?
An explanation :

Until the end of the 1960s, all camera lenses were protected against reflections and flare with a single- or dual layer of coatings. After that time, lens makers applied a new technology of layered coatings to their lenses: Multi Coating.

Carl Zeiss called it's version of Multi Coating T*. In a joint-venture with Zeiss, Rollei developed their own version of Multi Coating and named it HFT for High Fidelity Transfer.

Remember, it was the time of High Fidelity being a big thing in Home Stereo development.

In 1972, Rollei started their own production of lenses under license from Carl Zeiss; this took place in the former Voigtländer Optical Works near the Rollei factory in Brunswick, Germany, which had been acquired by Zeiss and Rollei at the time. The German production of 'Made by Rollei' lenses, and those made in Singapore, were all HFT lenses.

Except for the fact that multi coated lenses bear the HFT sign on the front lens mount HFT lenses can be easily identified because they glow red and/or  dark green, as opposed to single or dual coated Zeiss lenses which have a golden and blue glow. A few Zeiss lenses have been sold with HFT coating not bearing the HFT sign on the lens.

Having HFT multi coating is only important when a small bright source of light strikes the front lens. In that case, the lens shows more of a greyish lens flare than the HFT version will do. Ghost images will also appear more visible.

For Medium Format Photography, HFT is less important with lenses from 80mm to 1000mm, especially when the lens shade is used. For the 80mm lens, since the front element is safely recessed, and especially with the shade mounted, there is seldom a chance of flaring, but it is possible in certain situations.

For the wide angle lenses, when shooting back lit and outdoors, HFT is better, especially with the big 40mm lens. The 30mm Fisheye, the 40mm Distagon FLE and the 60mm Distagon only exist in HFT versions, because they are designs released after 1972. For the 50mm Distagon, if you are shooting outdoors a lot, and against the light, HFT is a beneficial thing to have.

Keep in mind that the original Zeiss lenses with dual coating already were extremely good protected against flare, and according to some connoisseurs, the HFT coated lenses are believed to draw a little bit softer image.
[134 楼] (扎西德勒) [资深泡菜]
08-10-15 10:59
原文由 zc 发表
rvp50

[zc 编辑于 2008-10-15 08:29]


漂亮一组,请问是否22光圈及PS如锐化?用的边框软件?谢谢。

[(扎西德勒) 编辑于 2008-10-15 11:01]
[133 楼] zc [陈年泡菜]
08-10-15 08:27
rvp50
[zc 编辑于 2008-10-15 08:29]