你搜“适马 85”就都能出来了，我在广州老摄友那家买的，貌似成都还有家4850的。但我发现问了几家北京的能不能见面交易，他们其实都没有现货，都是从深圳统一发货的，我估计好几家的货源渠道是一样的。

收到后一定第一时间向大家汇报情况~~

===========================================================
我也很激动，朋友你给个链接吧！太便宜了，都以为是骗子了！
快给个链接吧，求你了，谢谢！

哪个商家？低于5000啦？我也想弄一个了！

热烈祝贺！等待佳作！

今天淘宝上订了，水货4880，激动等待中。。。。。

我个人觉得反差大的镜头拍逆光不是很好看，会局部形成死黑

如果镜头本身发差大的话，逆光片子的作者也喜欢通过后期降低色彩饱和以及对比度

不过适马的焦外很柔和，发差适中，所以拍逆光比较柔

您说的"淡"是否意味着镜头的反差大了，这对逆光拍摄是不利的，探讨。

适马新定焦镜头（50、85）对黄、绿表现明显
而高光部分适马采集到的色彩会比较淡一些
因此最适合拍逆光照，适合日系爱好者
可能是和镀膜、镜头结构有关

冲着这个价钱，85/1.4D都出掉了，进这个玩玩

室内混合光线，自动白平衡，JPG直出。

坐等老编

吴大湿回来了！

期待大师权威报告。

看了几天这支头的帖子，准备入一支！
另，打口水仗的怎么那么多，我要是不差钱肯定也上85/1.4G了，问题就是性价比嘛。
出片是硬道理，希望大家继续多多上些好片~

把口径整到82，

通光量加大，
背景虑化就加强了。

不过紫边更不好控制作了

适马也要研究一个纳米的涂层出来就好。

这是Lenstip网站对S85测试的总结，从中可以看出该网站认为S85几乎全面超过了原厂的同类镜头，只是在慧差方面稍差。我现在考虑的问题是：S85真如这个网站说的那么优秀吗？
Sigma 85 mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM
11. Summary
Pros:

high build quality,
excellent image quality in the frame centre,
good image quality on the edge of the frame,
slight lateral chromatic aberration,
negligible distortion,
well-corrected astigmatism,
the lowest vignetting in this class of equipment,
good work against bright light,
quick, silent and accurate autofocus,
rich selection of standard accessories,
three years of guarantee with the possibility of extending it by next two years.

Cons:

coma in full frame corners is a bit too high,
manual focus ring not very precise,
noticeable longitudinal chromatic aberration.

When it comes to the image resolution the Sigma can compete on equal terms with the new Nikkor 1.4/85 and the expensive Canon 1.2/85 and it fares better than the Zeiss 1.4/85 and the Samyang 1.4/85. In the case of the chromatic aberration, distortion, vignetting of the work against bright light the tested lens defeats most of competitors hands down. Only in the category of coma it fares a bit worse. The autofocus, a thing often considered to be the Sigmas’ problem, here works beyond reproach – it is quicker than that of the Nikkor and the Zeiss and not less accurate. In our tests we had two Sigma 1.4/85 lenses at our disposal with two different mounts and they were attached to four bodies in total. On none of them the lens needed any micro calibration – it sharpened exactly where we wanted it to.

We rarely publish uncompromising opinions in our summaries but here it would be difficult not to include one. Providing you own a Nikon or Sony reflex camera I personally don’t see any reason why you should buy any brand-name 1.4/85 lenses. The Sigma is cheaper, better and it comes with a longer guarantee – as simple as that. You must be really very infatuated with “Zeiss” or “Nikkor” magical words to prefer their lenses to the Sigma.

In the case of the Pentax reflex cameras the Sigma can find a serious competition in the shape of the Pentax smc FA 77 mm f/1.8 Limited which has been assessed very well. It provides excellent build quality, very good optics and it is significantly cheaper than the Sigma. It has one serious flaw, though – its aperture is only f/1.8 fast, not f/1.4. That’s why I don’t doubt the Sigma will find a wide group of fans in that system too.

The situation remains the most interesting for the owners of Canon reflex cameras because they have the biggest choice now. For an amount of money of 350 $ they can either buy a well-known and popular EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM model or a manual Samyang 1.4/85. If you have a bigger budget at your disposal and you want to own something better you should get interested in the Sigma for sure. If the f/1.2 aperture is a necessary feature for you and you want to have a wider manual focus range you can always opt for the most expensive device of all, the Canon EF 85 mm f/1.2L II USM. Of course it may be disputable whether it is worth spending two times more money just to upgrade from f/1.4 to f/1.2, especially in a situation when there are many testing categories in which the Sigma still fares better than the expensive L-series Canon lens. Such a discussion, though, fits a thread on a forum better than the summary of our test.

[repairman 编辑于 2011-01-06 09:49]

谢谢挂念呵呵。
由此亦可见，定价很重要。一般人都是根据价格来判定性能、质量等等，心理上不自觉的尽量往价格上靠，自己是对的由于价格原因反而也会怀疑自己。看了那个和85G的对比，S85分辨率真的极其优秀，又高于原厂了。

说的极是。

同等中。。。
貌似性价比高实际就是物超所值吧。就目前所知，相比尼康85G，S85锐度更好，焦外略逊，紫边略重，各有千秋，实际上是同一档次镜头，不像S50那样几乎全面超越原厂50D/G，所以作为口碑不如原厂的副厂价格上自然要妥协了。

吴大师你终于回来了，没了你无忌冷清多了！Sigma85mm1.4实际售价仅有5000多点，要说性价比那是没说的，就等权威的对比测试呢，不过真是物所超值恐怕就不是这个价了。

总算回来了，也过完节了，赶紧过来看看死马85咋样了。
S85总算出了，锐度很好，焦外没想象的那么好，当然，具体还得看对比评测。价格比以前想象的低多来了，还以为要超1w的，才6k啊，也好久了怎么还没和尼康85D/G、ZF85的对比评测？
冲它这么便宜回头也要搞一个看看，到时将蔡司ZF.2 85拿来一起PKPK。

这张的虚化好强，有点似85L2的感觉

请问该头是否可用2X增距镜？有人试过嘛？

上一张。。。。

色彩 挺统一的，构图也好，就是姿式没有表现好

这张 全开1.4 有紫边,呵呵

还是喜欢原图！

洋马子真Open啊。